D.P. Johnson
Impact in
- Applied Psychology top 10%
- Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
-
- Schizophrenia research and treatment
Papers in
-
- Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction 2
-
- Schizophrenia research and treatment 2
- Co-authors
- David L. Penn (2 shared papers)Acacia C. Parks (1 shared paper)Piper Meyer-Kalos (1 shared paper)Kim T. Mueser (1 shared paper)Diana O. Perkins (1 shared paper)Katherine C. Brewer (1 shared paper)R. O. Peckinpaugh (1 shared paper)Earl A. Edwards (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Nuclear Physics B (1 paper)Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences (1 paper)The Journal of Positive Psychology (1 paper)Early Intervention in Psychiatry (1 paper)Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSwitzerlandItaly
In The Last Decade
D.P. Johnson
5 papers receiving 167 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
- Applied Psychology 40
- Psychiatry and Mental health 68
- Social Psychology 84
- Clinical Psychology 77
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 43
Countries citing papers authored by D.P. Johnson
This map shows the geographic impact of D.P. Johnson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D.P. Johnson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D.P. Johnson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by D.P. Johnson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by D.P. Johnson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D.P. Johnson. The network helps show where D.P. Johnson may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside D.P. Johnson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2012 | 122 | |
| 2 | 2010 | 33 | |
| 3 | 1970 | 20 | |
| 4 | 1984 | 4 | |
| 5 | 1973 | 2 |
About D.P. Johnson
D.P. Johnson is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Applied Psychology, having authored 5 papers that have together received 181 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (2 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (2 papers), Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (2 papers), High-Energy Particle Collisions Research (2 papers), Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (1 paper), Mental Health Research Topics (1 paper), Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena (1 paper) and Optimism, Hope, and Well-being (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (40 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (68 citations), Social Psychology (84 citations), Clinical Psychology (77 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (43 citations). D.P. Johnson has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and Italy. Frequent co-authors include David L. Penn, Acacia C. Parks, Piper Meyer-Kalos, Kim T. Mueser, Diana O. Perkins, Katherine C. Brewer, R. O. Peckinpaugh, Earl A. Edwards, George Gee Jackson and W. E. Pierce. Their work appears in journals such as Nuclear Physics B, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, The Journal of Positive Psychology, Early Intervention in Psychiatry and Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.