Douglas Ney

39 papers receiving 507 citations

Peers

Douglas Ney
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Genetics 343
  • Neurology 149
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 176
  • Oncology 105
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 64
Replace Ping‐Ching Pai with:
Ping‐Ching Pai Taiwan
Gerald W. Marsa United States
Ling-Wei Wang Taiwan
Kanta Bhambhani United States
Marie Lindgren Sweden
L.S. Constine United States
Daniel Yakar United States
Kate Carroll United States
Wolfgang Behnisch Germany
Robert J. Bohinski United States
Douglas Ney relative to Ping‐Ching Pai Taiwan Ping‐Ching Pai's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Ping‐Ching Pai · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Douglas Ney

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Douglas Ney's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Douglas Ney with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Douglas Ney more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Douglas Ney

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Douglas Ney. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Douglas Ney. The network helps show where Douglas Ney may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Douglas Ney, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Douglas Ney Line = papers co-authored together Douglas Ney links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 46 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201259
2 202054
3 200948
4 201043
5 201639
6 201330
7 201427
8 201527
9 201726
10 201417
11 202015
12 201213
13 202112
14 201412
15 201812
16 202110
17 202010
18 20187
19 20196
20 20196

About Douglas Ney

Douglas Ney is a scholar working on Genetics, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Neurology, Epidemiology and Oncology, having authored 46 papers that have together received 518 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment (29 papers), Brain Metastases and Treatment (17 papers), CNS Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (10 papers), Meningioma and schwannoma management (9 papers), Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (4 papers), Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques (4 papers), Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research (2 papers) and Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Genetics (343 citations), Neurology (149 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (176 citations), Oncology (105 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (64 citations). Douglas Ney has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Kevin O. Lillehei, Brian D. Kavanagh, Laurie E. Gaspar, Changhu Chen, Krishna Reddy, Lisa M. DeAngelis, Andrew B. Lassman, Denise M. Damek, Allen Waziri and Denise Damek. Their work appears in journals such as Neuro-Oncology, Journal of Clinical Oncology, Neurology, International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics and Journal of Neuro-Oncology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact