Douglas MacFarlane
Impact in
- Ecological Modeling top 5%
- Species Distribution and Climate Change
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Animal and Plant Science Education
Papers in
-
- Sex work and related issues 2
-
- Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses 1
- Co-authors
- Ricardo Rocha (2 shared papers)Ullrich K. H. Ecker (5 shared papers)Mark J. Hurlstone (5 shared papers)William J. Sutherland (2 shared papers)Claire F. R. Wordley (1 shared paper)Elizabeth H. M. Tyler (1 shared paper)Philip A. Martin (1 shared paper)Gorm E. Shackelford (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Psychology and Health (2 papers)Biological Conservation (2 papers)Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition (1 paper)Conservation Biology (1 paper)Archives of Sexual Behavior (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Douglas MacFarlane
11 papers receiving 380 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
- Ecological Modeling 74
- Social Psychology 83
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 46
- Ecology 94
- Health 23
Countries citing papers authored by Douglas MacFarlane
This map shows the geographic impact of Douglas MacFarlane's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Douglas MacFarlane with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Douglas MacFarlane more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Douglas MacFarlane
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Douglas MacFarlane. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Douglas MacFarlane. The network helps show where Douglas MacFarlane may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Douglas MacFarlane, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2019 | 119 | |
| 2 | 2020 | 87 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 63 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 46 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 24 | |
| 6 | 1988 | 14 | |
| 7 | 2018 | 12 | |
| 8 | 2022 | 12 | |
| 9 | 1984 | 11 | |
| 10 | 2015 | 10 | |
| 11 | 2020 | 8 |
About Douglas MacFarlane
Douglas MacFarlane is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Social Psychology, Ecology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 11 papers that have together received 406 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sex work and related issues (2 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (2 papers), Human-Animal Interaction Studies (2 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (2 papers), Animal and Plant Science Education (2 papers), Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy (1 paper), Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (1 paper) and Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (74 citations), Social Psychology (83 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (46 citations), Ecology (94 citations) and Health (23 citations). Douglas MacFarlane has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Ricardo Rocha, Ullrich K. H. Ecker, Mark J. Hurlstone, William J. Sutherland, Claire F. R. Wordley, Elizabeth H. M. Tyler, Philip A. Martin, Gorm E. Shackelford, Nigel G. Taylor and Lynn V. Dicks. Their work appears in journals such as Psychology and Health, Biological Conservation, Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, Conservation Biology and Archives of Sexual Behavior.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.