Douglas Ford

41 papers receiving 883 citations

Peers

Douglas Ford
Comparison fields: 5 of 147
  • Clinical Psychology 219
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 42
  • Soil Science 73
  • Geochemistry and Petrology 31
  • General Health Professions 101
Replace John H. Campbell with:
John H. Campbell United States
Jonathan M. Sykes United States
Han Sh South Korea
Karen Lynn Clark United States
Bertil Axelsson Sweden
John D. McKenzie Australia
Stefanie Mayer Germany
Rachel Elizabeth Harris United Kingdom
Matthew J. Sullivan Australia
Katie Smith United Kingdom
Douglas Ford relative to John H. Campbell United States John H. Campbell's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×7.6×
John H. Campbell · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Douglas Ford

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Douglas Ford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Douglas Ford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Douglas Ford more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Douglas Ford

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Douglas Ford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Douglas Ford. The network helps show where Douglas Ford may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Douglas Ford, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Douglas Ford Line = papers co-authored together Douglas Ford links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 49 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003173
2 197781
3 200764
4 201464
5 200859
6 198559
7 198451
8 198446
9 200345
10 200542
11 197736
12 197831
13 200630
14 197828
15 196528
16 195423
17
Immunological properties of peptic fragments of bovine serum albumin.
197917
18 198714
19 198711
20 198911

About Douglas Ford

Douglas Ford is a scholar working on Cultural Studies, Political Science and International Relations, Electrochemistry, Ecology and Sensory Systems, having authored 49 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Intelligence, Security, War Strategy (5 papers), Anesthesia and Pain Management (5 papers), Migration, Health and Trauma (3 papers), Electrochemical Analysis and Applications (3 papers), Japanese History and Culture (3 papers), Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations (2 papers), Polymer Surface Interaction Studies (2 papers) and Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (219 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (42 citations), Soil Science (73 citations), Geochemistry and Petrology (31 citations) and General Health Professions (101 citations). Douglas Ford has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Amadeo J. Pesce, P. Prithvi Raj, Grzegorz Skrzypek, Pauline F. Grierson, Prithvi P. Raj, Charles E. Pither, Victor E. Pollak, John A. Wilkinson, Allen S. Keller and Chau Trinh‐Shevrin. Their work appears in journals such as Anesthesiology, Anesthesia & Analgesia, War in History, The Journal of Pediatrics and The International History Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact