Don Mitchell

3.4k citations
46 papers · 2.2k · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

Don Mitchell

45 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Peers

Don Mitchell
Comparison fields: 5 of 107
  • Urban Studies 683
  • Geography, Planning and Development 411
  • Sociology and Political Science 1.1k
  • Finance 243
  • General Health Professions 491
Replace Deborah G. Martin with:
Deborah G. Martin United States
Matthew Sparke United States
Alison Blunt United Kingdom
Leonie Sandercock Canada
Jenny Pickerill United Kingdom
Linda Peake Canada
Audrey Kobayashi Canada
Helga Leitner United States
Rüth Wilson Gilmore United States
David Featherstone United Kingdom
Don Mitchell relative to Deborah G. Martin United States Deborah G. Martin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Deborah G. Martin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Don Mitchell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Don Mitchell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Don Mitchell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Don Mitchell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Don Mitchell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Don Mitchell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Don Mitchell. The network helps show where Don Mitchell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Don Mitchell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Don Mitchell Line = papers co-authored together Don Mitchell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 46 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1997412
2 1997292
3 1995255
4 2009156
5 1997152
6 2004108
7 200692
8 200582
9 200279
10 199659
11 201659
12 199648
13 201345
14 201140
15 199835
16 199831
17 200729
18 200526
19 199226
20
The liberalization of free speech: Or, how protest in public space is silenced
201319

About Don Mitchell

Don Mitchell is a scholar working on Urban Studies, Sociology and Political Science, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, General Health Professions and Geography, Planning and Development, having authored 46 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Urban Planning and Governance (9 papers), American Environmental and Regional History (7 papers), Geographies of human-animal interactions (4 papers), Law in Society and Culture (4 papers), Public Spaces through Art (4 papers), Urbanization and City Planning (4 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (4 papers) and Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Urban Studies (683 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (411 citations), Sociology and Political Science (1.1k citations), Finance (243 citations) and General Health Professions (491 citations). Don Mitchell has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Richard B. Walker, Lynn A. Staeheli, Nik Heynen, Mario T. García, Kafui Attoh, Scott Kirsch, Neil Smith, Neil Smith, Mark B. Robbins and Nancy Cantor. Their work appears in journals such as Urban Geography, Antipode, Environment and Planning A Economy and Space, Political Geography and Economic Geography.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact