Don J. Sharpsteen

535 citations
8 papers · 383 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Don J. Sharpsteen

8 papers receiving 335 citations

Peers

Don J. Sharpsteen
Comparison fields: 5 of 35
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 205
  • Social Psychology 265
  • Clinical Psychology 140
  • Demography 57
  • Sociology and Political Science 197
Replace Noam Segal with:
Noam Segal United States
Dylan Selterman United States
Anna Garrett Kusche Canada
Richard L. Michalski United States
Juliana E. French United States
Carey J. Fitzgerald United States
O Jiaqing United Kingdom
Lucy L. Hunt United States
Janine Hertel Germany
Lindsey A. Beck United States
Don J. Sharpsteen relative to Noam Segal United States Noam Segal's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Noam Segal · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Don J. Sharpsteen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Don J. Sharpsteen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Don J. Sharpsteen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Don J. Sharpsteen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Don J. Sharpsteen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Don J. Sharpsteen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Don J. Sharpsteen. The network helps show where Don J. Sharpsteen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 3 scholars most cited alongside Don J. Sharpsteen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Don J. Sharpsteen Line = papers co-authored together Don J. Sharpsteen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
#Work
1 1997142
2 1997118
3 199344
4
The organization of jealousy knowledge: Romantic jealousy as a blended emotion.
199140
5 199530
6 19875
7 19943
8
The Psychology problem solver : a complete solution guide to any textbook
20031

About Don J. Sharpsteen

Don J. Sharpsteen is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Sociology and Political Science and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 8 papers that have together received 383 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (3 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (3 papers), Infant Development and Preterm Care (1 paper), Emotional Intelligence and Performance (1 paper), Marriage and Sexual Relationships (1 paper), Emotions and Moral Behavior (1 paper), Teacher Professional Development and Motivation (1 paper) and Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (205 citations), Social Psychology (265 citations), Clinical Psychology (140 citations), Demography (57 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (197 citations). Don J. Sharpsteen has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Lee A. Kirkpatrick, Vicki S. Helgeson and Patricia H. Ellison. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, Acta Paediatrica and Medical Entomology and Zoology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact