Dirk Smeets

6.1k citations
70 papers · 1.6k · h-index 22

Impact in

Papers in

Dirk Smeets

66 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

Dirk Smeets
Comparison fields: 5 of 130
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 593
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 286
  • Neurology 106
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 266
  • Health Informatics 13
Replace Farida Chériet with:
Farida Chériet Canada
Yung‐Nien Sun Taiwan
Yonggang Shi United States
Horst K. Hahn Germany
Carmel Hayes United Kingdom
Roger Tam Canada
T.M. Peters Canada
Stanley Durrleman France
R. Kikinis United States
Luke Sonoda United Kingdom
Dirk Smeets relative to Farida Chériet Canada Farida Chériet's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Farida Chériet · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dirk Smeets

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dirk Smeets's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dirk Smeets with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dirk Smeets more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dirk Smeets

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dirk Smeets. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dirk Smeets. The network helps show where Dirk Smeets may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Dirk Smeets, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dirk Smeets Line = papers co-authored together Dirk Smeets links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 70 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015165
2 2012120
3 2012101
4 200996
5 201878
6 201077
7 201075
8 201653
9 201550
10 201146
11 201745
12 201843
13 201238
14 202034
15 201132
16 202131
17 201730
18 201628
19 201927
20 200827

About Dirk Smeets

Dirk Smeets is a scholar working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Cognitive Neuroscience and Computational Mechanics, having authored 70 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (17 papers), Face and Expression Recognition (9 papers), Face recognition and analysis (9 papers), Medical Image Segmentation Techniques (8 papers), Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (7 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (7 papers), Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (6 papers) and Biometric Identification and Security (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (593 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (286 citations), Neurology (106 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (266 citations) and Health Informatics (13 citations). Dirk Smeets has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Dirk Vandermeulen, Paul Suetens, Diana M. Sima, Johannes Keustermans, Wim Van Hecke, Jeroen Hermans, Saurabh Jain, Peter Claes, Annemie Ribbens and Sabine Van Huffel. Their work appears in journals such as NeuroImage Clinical, Alzheimer s & Dementia, Multiple Sclerosis Journal, Brain and Behavior and Neurology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact