Dinan Wang

17 papers receiving 361 citations

Peers

Dinan Wang
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Global and Planetary Change 61
  • Computational Mechanics 59
  • Atmospheric Science 46
  • Energy Engineering and Power Technology 8
  • Artificial Intelligence 65
Replace Andrew Glaws with:
Andrew Glaws United States
Loïc Le Gratiet France
Rémi Lafage France
Shuangcheng Sun China
Zhanjie Li China
Qingfeng Hu China
Mathilde Mougeot France
Sergey Voronin United States
G. E. Archer United Kingdom
Julia Mullen United States
Dinan Wang relative to Andrew Glaws United States Andrew Glaws's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×20×
Andrew Glaws · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dinan Wang

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dinan Wang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dinan Wang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dinan Wang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dinan Wang

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dinan Wang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dinan Wang. The network helps show where Dinan Wang may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Dinan Wang, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dinan Wang Line = papers co-authored together Dinan Wang links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 201382
2 201177
3 201351
4 200935
5 201523
6 200721
7 202320
8 200915
9 200710
10 20198
11 20138
12 20256
13 20025
14 20144
15 20083
16 20111
17 20111

About Dinan Wang

Dinan Wang is a scholar working on Computational Mechanics, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Global and Planetary Change and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 17 papers that have together received 370 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Lattice Boltzmann Simulation Studies (4 papers), Climate variability and models (3 papers), Protein Structure and Dynamics (2 papers), Laser-induced spectroscopy and plasma (2 papers), Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research (2 papers), Cryospheric studies and observations (2 papers), Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications (2 papers) and Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Global and Planetary Change (61 citations), Computational Mechanics (59 citations), Atmospheric Science (46 citations), Energy Engineering and Power Technology (8 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (65 citations). Dinan Wang has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, China and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include J. Bernsdorf, Lihong Guo, Heqi Wang, Gai‐Ge Wang, Clemens Simmer, Thorsten Simon, Christian Ohlwein, Jonathan Summers, Christoph Menz and Philip Gaskell. Their work appears in journals such as Computers & Mathematics with Applications, Lecture notes in computational science and engineering, Physics of Plasmas, BMC Public Health and Tellus A Dynamic Meteorology and Oceanography.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact