Dina Silner

435 citations
17 papers · 325 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Dina Silner

16 papers receiving 305 citations

Peers

Dina Silner
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Emergency Medical Services 89
  • Research and Theory 7
  • Pharmacy 21
  • Family Practice 8
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 21
Replace Heather Gluyas with:
Heather Gluyas Australia
Aram Feizi Iran
Patricia S. Groves United States
Vesile Ünver Türkiye
Jon Allard United Kingdom
Karen B. Haller United States
Lauren Toomey United States
Anne Jones United Kingdom
Roxane Gardner United States
Gonzalo Duarte Clíments Spain
Dina Silner relative to Heather Gluyas Australia Heather Gluyas's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
Heather Gluyas · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dina Silner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dina Silner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dina Silner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dina Silner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dina Silner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dina Silner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dina Silner. The network helps show where Dina Silner may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 4 scholars most cited alongside Dina Silner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dina Silner Line = papers co-authored together Dina Silner links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 200587
2 200644
3 200438
4 200728
5 200927
6 200521
7 200715
8 200514
9 200514
10 200713
11 20069
12 20065
13
[Caregivers' role in breaking bad news: patients, doctors, and nurses' points of view].
20064
14 20053
15 20061
16 20041
17 20051

About Dina Silner

Dina Silner is a scholar working on Emergency Medical Services, General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology and Surgery, having authored 17 papers that have together received 325 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Disaster Response and Management (3 papers), Organ Donation and Transplantation (2 papers), Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (2 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (2 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (2 papers), Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (1 paper), Surgical Simulation and Training (1 paper) and Nursing education and management (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Emergency Medical Services (89 citations), Research and Theory (7 citations), Pharmacy (21 citations), Family Practice (8 citations) and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (21 citations). Dina Silner has collaborated with scholars based in Israel, United States and Serbia. Frequent co-authors include Michal Rassin, Ilya Kagan, Yair Bechor and M. Ehrenfeld. Their work appears in journals such as International Nursing Review, Nurse Education in Practice, JONA The Journal of Nursing Administration, AORN Journal and Cancer Nursing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact