Dimitri Gioev

959 citations
8 papers · 528 · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

Dimitri Gioev

7 papers receiving 505 citations

Peers

Dimitri Gioev
Comparison fields: 5 of 24
  • Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 74
  • Statistics and Probability 157
  • Mathematical Physics 141
  • Condensed Matter Physics 136
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 321
Replace Filippo Colomo with:
Filippo Colomo Italy
Vladimir V. Mangazeev Australia
Shinsuke M. Nishigaki Japan
Paul Zinn-Justin France
Omar Foda Australia
A. V. Razumov Russia
Karol K. Kozłowski France
Tom Claeys Belgium
N Kitanine France
Atsushi Nakayashiki Japan
Dimitri Gioev relative to Filippo Colomo Italy Filippo Colomo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
Filippo Colomo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dimitri Gioev

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dimitri Gioev's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dimitri Gioev with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dimitri Gioev more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dimitri Gioev

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dimitri Gioev. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dimitri Gioev. The network helps show where Dimitri Gioev may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 3 scholars most cited alongside Dimitri Gioev, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dimitri Gioev Line = papers co-authored together Dimitri Gioev links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
#Work
1 2006335
2 200984
3 200676
4 200825
5
Generalizations of Szego Limit Theorem : Higher Order Terms and Discontinuous Symbols
20015
6 20072
7
20021
8 20030

About Dimitri Gioev

Dimitri Gioev is a scholar working on Statistics and Probability, Mathematical Physics, Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 8 papers that have together received 528 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Random Matrices and Applications (7 papers), Advanced Algebra and Geometry (5 papers), Advanced Combinatorial Mathematics (2 papers), Advanced Topics in Algebra (1 paper), Holomorphic and Operator Theory (1 paper), Molecular spectroscopy and chirality (1 paper), Markov Chains and Monte Carlo Methods (1 paper) and Quantum many-body systems (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (74 citations), Statistics and Probability (157 citations), Mathematical Physics (141 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (136 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (321 citations). Dimitri Gioev has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Israel Klich, Percy Deift and Ovidiu Costin. Their work appears in journals such as Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, Communications in Partial Differential Equations, Physical Review Letters, Journal of Statistical Physics and International Mathematics Research Notices.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact