Diego Hojsgaard

1.9k citations
49 papers · 1.4k · h-index 22

Impact in

Papers in

Diego Hojsgaard

48 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Diego Hojsgaard
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 1.2k
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 229
  • Plant Science 672
  • Food Science 165
  • Forestry 30
Replace Pablo Speranza with:
Pablo Speranza Uruguay
Ana Ortega‐Olivencia Spain
Judith Hough‐Goldstein United States
Rémy Pasquet France
Caroline Turchetto Brazil
Wilfredo L. Gonzáles Chile
Anna Krahulcová Czechia
Lucas C. Majure United States
José L. Vesprini Argentina
Stephen D. Hight United States
Diego Hojsgaard relative to Pablo Speranza Uruguay Pablo Speranza's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.7×
Pablo Speranza · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Diego Hojsgaard

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Diego Hojsgaard's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Diego Hojsgaard with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Diego Hojsgaard more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Diego Hojsgaard

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Diego Hojsgaard. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Diego Hojsgaard. The network helps show where Diego Hojsgaard may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Diego Hojsgaard, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Diego Hojsgaard Line = papers co-authored together Diego Hojsgaard links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 49 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014167
2 2019133
3 2013121
4 201380
5 201476
6 201276
7 201272
8 201568
9 201654
10 200853
11 201848
12 201442
13 201542
14 201834
15 200832
16 201129
17 201927
18 201525
19 202024
20 201224

About Diego Hojsgaard

Diego Hojsgaard is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Plant Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Molecular Biology and Food Science, having authored 49 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant Taxonomy and Phylogenetics (41 papers), Plant and fungal interactions (16 papers), Botanical Research and Applications (7 papers), Chromosomal and Genetic Variations (7 papers), Plant Diversity and Evolution (6 papers), Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (5 papers), Plant and animal studies (5 papers) and Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (1.2k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (229 citations), Plant Science (672 citations), Food Science (165 citations) and Forestry (30 citations). Diego Hojsgaard has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Argentina and United States. Frequent co-authors include Elvira Hörandl, Eric J. Martínez, Camilo L. Quarín, Simone Klatt, Timothy F. Sharbel, John G. Carman, Marco Pellino, Ana I. Honfi, Carlos A. Acuña and Ladislav Hodač. Their work appears in journals such as Genes, Frontiers in Plant Science, Annals of Botany, Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences and New Phytologist.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact