Dic Lo

492 citations
29 papers · 239 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Dic Lo

28 papers receiving 199 citations

Peers

Dic Lo
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 59
  • Development 22
  • Strategy and Management 52
  • Accounting 39
  • Economics and Econometrics 93
Replace Santiago Pinto with:
Santiago Pinto United States
Daniel I. Okimoto United States
Kåre Johansen Norway
John M. Litwack United States
Edward J. Lincoln United States
Yuri Sato Japan
Clifford Zinnes United States
George T. Abed United States
Noel P. Johnston United States
Ali M. El‐Agraa Japan
Dic Lo relative to Santiago Pinto United States Santiago Pinto's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.4×
Santiago Pinto · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dic Lo

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dic Lo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dic Lo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dic Lo more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dic Lo

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dic Lo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dic Lo. The network helps show where Dic Lo may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside Dic Lo, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dic Lo Line = papers co-authored together Dic Lo links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202139
2 201025
3 199723
4
The state and industrial policy in Chinese economic development
201418
5 199916
6 202014
7 200214
8 201614
9 199810
10 20119
11 20118
12 19957
13 20117
14 20116
15 20134
16 20014
17 20203
18
China as a “model” of utilizing foreign capital for economic development: perceptions, observations and interpretation
20083
19 20183
20 20003

About Dic Lo

Dic Lo is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Economics and Econometrics, Strategy and Management and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 29 papers that have together received 239 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Global trade and economics (7 papers), China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance (6 papers), Economic Growth and Productivity (6 papers), Asian Industrial and Economic Development (4 papers), Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (3 papers), Economic Theory and Policy (3 papers), Political Economy and Marxism (2 papers) and Global Financial Crisis and Policies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (59 citations), Development (22 citations), Strategy and Management (52 citations), Accounting (39 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (93 citations). Dic Lo has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, China and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include Yu Zhang, Yu‐Chen Lin, Guicai Li, Yuk‐shing Cheng, Thomas Chan, Russell Smyth, Derek Morris, Yu Zhang and Samuel P. S. Ho. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of International Development, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Journal of Economic Issues, Review of Political Economy and Economy and Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact