Dianne Fejer

404 citations
11 papers · 340 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Dianne Fejer

11 papers receiving 258 citations

Peers

Dianne Fejer
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Applied Psychology 37
  • Clinical Psychology 85
  • Epidemiology 133
  • General Health Professions 82
  • Safety Research 26
Replace Coryl LaRue Jones with:
Coryl LaRue Jones Japan
Frederick Beauvais United States
Eva Rosenfeld United States
Margaret Hamilton Australia
Angela Paglia Canada
Dana L. Farnsworth United States
Harold M. Visotsky United States
Timmen L. Cermak United States
Debby Allen United Kingdom
Alan Gordon Canada
Dianne Fejer relative to Coryl LaRue Jones Japan Coryl LaRue Jones's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Coryl LaRue Jones · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dianne Fejer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dianne Fejer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dianne Fejer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dianne Fejer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dianne Fejer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dianne Fejer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dianne Fejer. The network helps show where Dianne Fejer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 2 scholars most cited alongside Dianne Fejer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dianne Fejer Line = papers co-authored together Dianne Fejer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 1972110
2 197135
3 197433
4 197329
5 197328
6 196926
7 197223
8
Six years of cross-sectional surveys of student drug use in Toronto.
197520
9 197614
10 197211
11 197311

About Dianne Fejer

Dianne Fejer is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Epidemiology, Education and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 11 papers that have together received 340 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychedelics and Drug Studies (2 papers), Misinformation and Its Impacts (2 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (2 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (2 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (2 papers), Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (1 paper), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (1 paper) and Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (37 citations), Clinical Psychology (85 citations), Epidemiology (133 citations), General Health Professions (82 citations) and Safety Research (26 citations). Dianne Fejer has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Reginald G. Smart and Paul C. Whitehead. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Drug Education, Journal of Drug Issues, Journal of Abnormal Psychology, Journal of Health and Social Behavior and Public Opinion Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact