Diane Powers

1.2k citations
24 papers · 848 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Diane Powers

23 papers receiving 810 citations

Peers

Diane Powers
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Applied Psychology 86
  • Social Psychology 313
  • General Health Professions 382
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 107
  • Clinical Psychology 120
Replace Elizabeth Fries with:
Elizabeth Fries United States
Patricia I. Moreno United States
Jennifer Bennett United States
Ruth Abrams United Kingdom
Van A. Cain United States
Macaran A. Baird United States
Tayebeh Fasihi Harandi Iran
Robert Nishimoto United States
Karla Espinosa Monteros United States
Kimberly Acquaviva United States
Diane Powers relative to Elizabeth Fries United States Elizabeth Fries's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Elizabeth Fries · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Diane Powers

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Diane Powers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Diane Powers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Diane Powers more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Diane Powers

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Diane Powers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Diane Powers. The network helps show where Diane Powers may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Diane Powers, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Diane Powers Line = papers co-authored together Diane Powers links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Long-term cost effects of collaborative care for late-life depression.
2008235
2 2012113
3 200367
4
Importance of psychological variables in understanding risk perceptions and breast cancer screening of African American women.
199865
5 200537
6 199837
7
Participation in breast cancer risk counseling among women with a family history.
199936
8 200534
9 200530
10 200830
11 200723
12 200121
13 201021
14 201920
15 202019
16 200119
17 202013
18 202013
19 20027
20 20213

About Diane Powers

Diane Powers is a scholar working on Social Psychology, General Health Professions, Genetics, Sociology and Political Science and Applied Psychology, having authored 24 papers that have together received 848 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mental Health Treatment and Access (9 papers), BRCA gene mutations in cancer (6 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (5 papers), LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (4 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (4 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (4 papers), Smoking Behavior and Cessation (2 papers) and Health Policy Implementation Science (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (86 citations), Social Psychology (313 citations), General Health Professions (382 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (107 citations) and Clinical Psychology (120 citations). Diane Powers has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Africa and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Jürgen Unützer, Deborah J. Bowen, Wayne Katon, Deborah J. Bowen, Elizabeth Lin, Michael Schoenbaum, Maria Pietronilla Penna, Anne McTiernan, Richard C. Veith and Anne Marie Shields. Their work appears in journals such as Women & Health, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, Health Affairs, International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Health Education & Behavior.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact