Diane Johnson

22 papers receiving 266 citations

Peers

Diane Johnson
Comparison fields: 5 of 110
  • Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 37
  • Archeology 7
  • Conservation 19
  • Geometry and Topology 33
  • Earth-Surface Processes 23
Replace László Kovács with:
László Kovács Hungary
Mark D. Meyerson United States
Trevor Evans Australia
Peter Donovan Australia
N. N. Vorob’ëv Belarus
Paul Pritchard Australia
Colin M. Ramsay United States
E. B. Dynkin
R. Kent Guy Canada
Stephen P. Humphries United States
Diane Johnson relative to László Kovács Hungary László Kovács's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×19×
László Kovács · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Diane Johnson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Diane Johnson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Diane Johnson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Diane Johnson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Diane Johnson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Diane Johnson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Diane Johnson. The network helps show where Diane Johnson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside Diane Johnson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Diane Johnson Line = papers co-authored together Diane Johnson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 196174
2
Historical Technology, Materials and Conservation: SEM and Microanalysis
201244
3 200730
4 201328
5 196222
6
Will to live.
200820
7 197115
8 196014
9 197213
10
Technology and Plagiarism in the University: Brief Report of a Trial in Detecting Cheating
20047
11
Artist as Chemist
20065
12 20085
13 19985
14 20173
15 20163
16
The patient talks back.
20083
17
Do Doctors Mean What They Say
19852
18 20031
19 20051
20 20091

About Diane Johnson

Diane Johnson is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Language and Linguistics, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Safety Research and Electrical and Electronic Engineering, having authored 31 papers that have together received 300 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Second Language Learning and Teaching (3 papers), graph theory and CDMA systems (3 papers), Academic integrity and plagiarism (2 papers), Multilingual Education and Policy (2 papers), EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning (2 papers), Mathematics and Applications (2 papers), Conservation Techniques and Studies (1 paper) and Online and Blended Learning (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (37 citations), Archeology (7 citations), Conservation (19 citations), Geometry and Topology (33 citations) and Earth-Surface Processes (23 citations). Diane Johnson has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include N. S. Mendelsohn, A. L. Dulmage, Stuart Kearns, John F. Murray, Irina P. Smoliakova, Jessica L. Wood, Franklin Dexter, Warren S. Sandberg, Jesse M. Ehrenfeld and Richard H. Epstein. Their work appears in journals such as Canadian Journal of Mathematics, Aequationes Mathematicae, Discrete Mathematics, Educational leadership and American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact