Diane E. Gregory

59 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Diane E. Gregory
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • Pharmacology 731
  • Medical Laboratory Technology 48
  • Occupational Therapy 118
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 235
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 494
Replace Erika Nelson-Wong with:
Erika Nelson-Wong United States
Nader Maroufi Iran
Åsa Dedering Sweden
Yu Okubo Japan
Hunter S. Greene United States
Sara P. Gombatto United States
Ali Sheikhzadeh United States
Teuvo Sihvonen Finland
Jan-Paul van Wingerden Netherlands
Morten Essendrop Norway
Diane E. Gregory relative to Erika Nelson-Wong United States Erika Nelson-Wong's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×7.5×
Erika Nelson-Wong · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Diane E. Gregory

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Diane E. Gregory's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Diane E. Gregory with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Diane E. Gregory more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Diane E. Gregory

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Diane E. Gregory. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Diane E. Gregory. The network helps show where Diane E. Gregory may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Diane E. Gregory, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Diane E. Gregory Line = papers co-authored together Diane E. Gregory links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 62 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008174
2 2007138
3 2006101
4 2019100
5 201163
6 200739
7 201238
8 201437
9 200632
10 201032
11 201529
12 201128
13 200727
14 200926
15 200826
16 201025
17 201723
18 201121
19 201720
20 201820

About Diane E. Gregory

Diane E. Gregory is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Occupational Therapy, Social Psychology and Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, having authored 62 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (38 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (31 papers), Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders (14 papers), Occupational Health and Performance (11 papers), Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (7 papers), Medical Imaging and Analysis (5 papers), Effects of Vibration on Health (4 papers) and Agriculture and Farm Safety (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (731 citations), Medical Laboratory Technology (48 citations), Occupational Therapy (118 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (235 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (494 citations). Diane E. Gregory has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, New Zealand and United States. Frequent co-authors include Jack P. Callaghan, Stephen H.M. Brown, David A. Winter, Erika Nelson-Wong, Nadine M. Dunk, Koichi Masuda, Stephan Milosavljevic, Robert L. Sah, Won C. Bae and Stephanie J. DeWitte‐Orr. Their work appears in journals such as European Spine Journal, Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, Ergonomics, Applied Ergonomics and International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact