Diana E. Mitchell

42 papers receiving 637 citations

Peers

Diana E. Mitchell
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
  • Neurology 339
  • Sensory Systems 107
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 278
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 28
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 95
Replace Roberta Riccelli with:
Roberta Riccelli United Kingdom
Luzia Grabherr Switzerland
Matthias Ertl Germany
Jason A. Cromer United States
Peggy Wackenier Belgium
Shir Hofstetter Netherlands
Kim Clark Australia
Martin Göttlich Germany
Mitsunari Abe Japan
Jerillyn S. Kent United States
Diana E. Mitchell relative to Roberta Riccelli United Kingdom Roberta Riccelli's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.7×
Roberta Riccelli · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Diana E. Mitchell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Diana E. Mitchell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Diana E. Mitchell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Diana E. Mitchell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Diana E. Mitchell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Diana E. Mitchell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Diana E. Mitchell. The network helps show where Diana E. Mitchell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Diana E. Mitchell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Diana E. Mitchell Line = papers co-authored together Diana E. Mitchell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 48 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2019103
2 202058
3 201354
4 198347
5 200940
6 201337
7 201636
8 200830
9 201827
10 201726
11 199923
12 202322
13 198521
14 202021
15 201520
16 201917
17 201010
18 20189
19
Exploring and Teaching the English Language Arts
19999
20 20198

About Diana E. Mitchell

Diana E. Mitchell is a scholar working on Neurology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Sensory Systems, Language and Linguistics and Visual Arts and Performing Arts, having authored 48 papers that have together received 679 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Vestibular and auditory disorders (13 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (8 papers), Tactile and Sensory Interactions (6 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (4 papers), EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning (4 papers), Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (3 papers), Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (3 papers) and Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (339 citations), Sensory Systems (107 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (278 citations), Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (28 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (95 citations). Diana E. Mitchell has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Kathleen E. Cullen, Charles C. Della Santina, Patrick Alan Forbes, Jean‐Sébastien Blouin, Soroush G. Sadeghi, Roberto Araya, Richard F. Hellon, Steve N. Davies, Sabrina Tazerart and Soledad Miranda‐Rottmann. Their work appears in journals such as Nature Communications, The Journal of Physiology, Journal of Neuroscience, Pediatric Emergency Care and The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact