D.F. Cole
Impact in
- Ophthalmology top 1%
- Glaucoma and retinal disorders
- Intraocular Surgery and Lenses
-
- Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
Papers in
-
- Glaucoma and retinal disorders 12
- Intraocular Surgery and Lenses 4
-
- Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology 5
- Co-authors
- WILLIAM G. UNGER (12 shared papers)M. W. B. Bradbury (1 shared paper)John M. Butler (6 shared papers)Brian R. Hammond (2 shared papers)Suryanarayanan Nagasubramanian (2 shared papers)Gerard Patrick McGregor (3 shared papers)Rebecca L. Rumble (2 shared papers)MARION A. BLANK (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Experimental Eye Research (23 papers)British Journal of Ophthalmology (11 papers)European Journal of Endocrinology (2 papers)Ophthalmic Research (2 papers)The Journal of Physiology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- MexicoUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
D.F. Cole
45 papers receiving 1.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
- Ophthalmology 600
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 490
- Neurology 148
- Sensory Systems 57
- Pharmacology 186
Countries citing papers authored by D.F. Cole
This map shows the geographic impact of D.F. Cole's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D.F. Cole with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D.F. Cole more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by D.F. Cole
This network shows the impact of papers produced by D.F. Cole. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D.F. Cole. The network helps show where D.F. Cole may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 21 scholars most cited alongside D.F. Cole, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 47 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1973 | 154 | |
| 2 | 1980 | 147 | |
| 3 | 1982 | 136 | |
| 4 | 1977 | 109 | |
| 5 | 1982 | 98 | |
| 6 | 1975 | 86 | |
| 7 | 1983 | 76 | |
| 8 | 1974 | 64 | |
| 9 | 1977 | 59 | |
| 10 | 1984 | 52 | |
| 11 | 1979 | 44 | |
| 12 | 1961 | 43 | |
| 13 | 1980 | 41 | |
| 14 | 1961 | 38 | |
| 15 | 1962 | 36 | |
| 16 | 1976 | 35 | |
| 17 | 1969 | 32 | |
| 18 | 1982 | 32 | |
| 19 | 1961 | 29 | |
| 20 | 1972 | 28 |
About D.F. Cole
D.F. Cole is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Physiology, Sensory Systems and Neurology, having authored 47 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Glaucoma and retinal disorders (12 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (6 papers), Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (5 papers), Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (4 papers), Barrier Structure and Function Studies (4 papers), Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (3 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (3 papers) and Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (600 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (490 citations), Neurology (148 citations), Sensory Systems (57 citations) and Pharmacology (186 citations). D.F. Cole has collaborated with scholars based in Mexico, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include WILLIAM G. UNGER, M. W. B. Bradbury, John M. Butler, Brian R. Hammond, Suryanarayanan Nagasubramanian, Gerard Patrick McGregor, Rebecca L. Rumble, MARION A. BLANK, S R Bloom and Ramesh C. Tripathi. Their work appears in journals such as Experimental Eye Research, British Journal of Ophthalmology, European Journal of Endocrinology, Ophthalmic Research and The Journal of Physiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.