Devjit Srivastava
Impact in
-
- Pain Management and Opioid Use
- Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
- Pain Management and Treatment
- Surgery top 10%
- Anesthesia and Pain Management
- Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
Papers in
-
- Pain Management and Opioid Use 5
- Pain Management and Treatment 2
- Surgery 7
- Anesthesia and Pain Management 7
- Co-authors
- Roger Knaggs (2 shared papers)Irwin T.H. Foo (1 shared paper)Andrew F Smith (1 shared paper)Naveen Eipe (1 shared paper)Arun Bhaskar (1 shared paper)Alan J.R. Macfarlane (1 shared paper)Paul Wilkinson (2 shared papers)Nicholas Levy (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- British Journal of Anaesthesia (4 papers)Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology (1 paper)Anaesthesia (1 paper)British Journal of Pain (2 papers)BMJ Open Quality (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomCanadaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Devjit Srivastava
10 papers receiving 407 citations
Devjit Srivastava's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 110
- Surgery 208
- Pharmacology 44
- Urology 14
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 6
Countries citing papers authored by Devjit Srivastava
This map shows the geographic impact of Devjit Srivastava's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Devjit Srivastava with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Devjit Srivastava more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Devjit Srivastava
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Devjit Srivastava. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Devjit Srivastava. The network helps show where Devjit Srivastava may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Devjit Srivastava, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The use of intravenous lidocaine for postoperative pain and recovery: international consensus statement on efficacy and safety Hit paper breakdown → | 2020 | 193 |
| 2 | 2019 | 79 | |
| 3 | 2021 | 71 | |
| 4 | 2017 | 30 | |
| 5 | 2012 | 19 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 18 | |
| 7 | 2019 | 10 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 3 | |
| 9 | 2014 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 11 | 2025 | 1 |
About Devjit Srivastava
Devjit Srivastava is a scholar working on Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Surgery, General Health Professions, Urology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 11 papers that have together received 426 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Anesthesia and Pain Management (7 papers), Pain Management and Opioid Use (5 papers), Pain Management and Treatment (2 papers), Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (2 papers), Health Services Management and Policy (2 papers), Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (1 paper) and Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (110 citations), Surgery (208 citations), Pharmacology (44 citations), Urology (14 citations) and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (6 citations). Devjit Srivastava has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Roger Knaggs, Irwin T.H. Foo, Andrew F Smith, Naveen Eipe, Arun Bhaskar, Alan J.R. Macfarlane, Paul Wilkinson, Nicholas Levy, David George Lambert and Andrei L. Okorokov. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Anaesthesia, Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology, Anaesthesia, British Journal of Pain and BMJ Open Quality.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.