Desiree Andersen

24 papers receiving 267 citations

Peers

Desiree Andersen
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
  • Ecological Modeling 55
  • Global and Planetary Change 111
  • Ecology 62
  • Developmental Biology 5
  • General Dentistry 1
Replace Paige E. Howell with:
Paige E. Howell United States
Oleksandra Oskyrko Ukraine
Megan M. Friggens United States
Brenton von Takach Australia
Aimara Planillo Germany
Garry Daly Australia
Andrew Douse United Kingdom
Xiaoquan Kong China
MJ Mahony Australia
Rene Jochem Netherlands
Desiree Andersen relative to Paige E. Howell United States Paige E. Howell's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.9×
Paige E. Howell · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Desiree Andersen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Desiree Andersen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Desiree Andersen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Desiree Andersen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Desiree Andersen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Desiree Andersen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Desiree Andersen. The network helps show where Desiree Andersen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Desiree Andersen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Desiree Andersen Line = papers co-authored together Desiree Andersen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201950
2 202039
3 201822
4 202118
5 202216
6 201915
7 202015
8 201813
9 202113
10 202211
11 20218
12 20207
13 20227
14 20226
15 20226
16 20224
17 20224
18 20224
19 20193
20 20192

About Desiree Andersen

Desiree Andersen is a scholar working on Ecological Modeling, Global and Planetary Change, Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Genetics, having authored 25 papers that have together received 269 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Amphibian and Reptile Biology (8 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (5 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (3 papers), Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation (3 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (2 papers), Physiological and biochemical adaptations (2 papers), Plant and animal studies (1 paper) and Hemiptera Insect Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (55 citations), Global and Planetary Change (111 citations), Ecology (62 citations), Developmental Biology (5 citations) and General Dentistry (1 citation). Desiree Andersen has collaborated with scholars based in South Korea, China and United States. Frequent co-authors include Yikweon Jang, Amaël Borzée, Hyun Tae Kim, Céline Clauzel, Yuseob Kim, Yeong‐Choy Kam, Yi‐Ju Yang, Taejoon Kwon, Mi‐Sook Min and Junghwa An. Their work appears in journals such as Animals, PeerJ, Scientific Reports, Global Ecology and Conservation and Animal Cells and Systems.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact