Derek Tam

1.2k citations
11 papers · 123 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Derek Tam

11 papers receiving 117 citations

Peers

Derek Tam
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • Artificial Intelligence 62
  • Health Informatics 2
  • General Social Sciences 3
  • Hepatology 7
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 17
Replace Taeuk Kim with:
Taeuk Kim South Korea
Sergey Demyanov Australia
Samuel Chapman United States
Katherine A. Keith United States
Emanuela Boroş France
Marius Mosbach Germany
José G. Moreno France
Thahir Mohamed United States
Jiaao Chen United States
Derek Tam relative to Taeuk Kim South Korea Taeuk Kim's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Taeuk Kim · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Derek Tam

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Derek Tam's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Derek Tam with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Derek Tam more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Derek Tam

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Derek Tam. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Derek Tam. The network helps show where Derek Tam may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Derek Tam, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Derek Tam Line = papers co-authored together Derek Tam links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 202359
2 202319
3 202310
4 201810
5 20227
6 20227
7 20176
8
Calculated decisions: Jones criteria for acute rheumatic fever diagnosis
20202
9 20221
10
Calculated decisions: Pediatric appendicitis risk calculator (pARC)
20191
11 20171

About Derek Tam

Derek Tam is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Emergency Medicine, Surgery, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition and Cell Biology, having authored 11 papers that have together received 123 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Natural Language Processing Techniques (3 papers), Intestinal Malrotation and Obstruction Disorders (2 papers), Zebrafish Biomedical Research Applications (2 papers), Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management (2 papers), Topic Modeling (2 papers), Neutrophil, Myeloperoxidase and Oxidative Mechanisms (1 paper), Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis (1 paper) and Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Artificial Intelligence (62 citations), Health Informatics (2 citations), General Social Sciences (3 citations), Hepatology (7 citations) and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (17 citations). Derek Tam has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Colin Raffel, Mohit Bansal, Jiaao Chen, Diyi Yang, Shiyue Zhang, Dian Yu, Steven Franconeri, R. Keith Humphries, Jeremy Parker and Eric Yung. Their work appears in journals such as Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Nature Communications, The American Journal of Emergency Medicine, Cognition and Blood.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact