Derek Lieber

2.0k citations
20 papers · 534 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Derek Lieber

20 papers receiving 482 citations

Peers

Derek Lieber
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
  • Hardware and Architecture 361
  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design 75
  • Computer Networks and Communications 318
  • Software 25
  • Artificial Intelligence 159
Replace Rakesh Komuravelli with:
Rakesh Komuravelli United States
Wolfgang Blochinger Germany
Hyojin Sung United States
J. Menon United States
Diego R. Llanos Spain
Jeff A. Stuart United States
Rémi Triolet France
Arturo González-Escribano Spain
F. Warren Burton United States
David Lugato France
Derek Lieber relative to Rakesh Komuravelli United States Rakesh Komuravelli's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Rakesh Komuravelli · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Derek Lieber

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Derek Lieber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Derek Lieber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Derek Lieber more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Derek Lieber

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Derek Lieber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Derek Lieber. The network helps show where Derek Lieber may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Derek Lieber, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Derek Lieber Line = papers co-authored together Derek Lieber links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 1999199
2 199173
3 200639
4 200435
5 200325
6 200825
7 200122
8 199918
9 200617
10 200314
11
Full Circle: Simulating Linux Clusters on Linux Clusters
200313
12 199712
13 200611
14 199910
15 200210
16 20064
17 19913
18 19862
19
Reducing the Overhead of Compilation Delay
20001
20 20041

About Derek Lieber

Derek Lieber is a scholar working on Computer Networks and Communications, Hardware and Architecture, Artificial Intelligence, Computational Theory and Mathematics and Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design, having authored 20 papers that have together received 534 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques (14 papers), Distributed and Parallel Computing Systems (7 papers), Interconnection Networks and Systems (7 papers), Advanced Data Storage Technologies (7 papers), Logic, programming, and type systems (3 papers), Computational Geometry and Mesh Generation (3 papers), Real-Time Systems Scheduling (2 papers) and Embedded Systems Design Techniques (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Hardware and Architecture (361 citations), Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design (75 citations), Computer Networks and Communications (318 citations), Software (25 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (159 citations). Derek Lieber has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Michael Karasick, Lee R. Nackman, Anthony Cocchi, Bowen Alpern, Ton Ngo, Susan Flynn Hummel, C. R. Attanasio, Stephen Smith, Mark Mergen and John Barton. Their work appears in journals such as ACM SIGPLAN Notices, ACM Transactions on Graphics, Algorithmica, IBM Systems Journal and Parallel Processing Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact