Dennis Smith

1.0k citations
48 papers · 565 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Dennis Smith

40 papers receiving 451 citations

Peers

Dennis Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Sociology and Political Science 380
  • Public Administration 18
  • Political Science and International Relations 99
  • Education 105
  • Urban Studies 20
Replace Paul Axelrod with:
Paul Axelrod Canada
Jorge Larraín Chile
Y. Michal Bodemann Canada
Angus Stewart United Kingdom
John Ralston Saul South Africa
Bart Landry United States
Donald Clark Hodges United States
Leonardo Salamini United States
Scott G. McNall United States
Eric Hobsbawm United Kingdom
Dennis Smith relative to Paul Axelrod Canada Paul Axelrod's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Paul Axelrod · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dennis Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dennis Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dennis Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dennis Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dennis Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dennis Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dennis Smith. The network helps show where Dennis Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Dennis Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dennis Smith Line = papers co-authored together Dennis Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 48 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1974146
2 199366
3 198945
4 200144
5 198838
6
Whose Europe? : the turn towards democracy
199937
7 199923
8 200120
9
Globalization: The Hidden Agenda
200620
10 200413
11 198311
12 198410
13 197610
14 19889
15 20088
16 19836
17 20105
18 19955
19 19925
20 19834

About Dennis Smith

Dennis Smith is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences and General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, having authored 48 papers that have together received 565 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sociology and Norbert Elias (5 papers), Historical Economic and Social Studies (3 papers), Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice (3 papers), Political Economy and Marxism (2 papers), Economic Theory and Policy (2 papers), Rural development and sustainability (2 papers), Australian History and Society (2 papers) and American Constitutional Law and Politics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sociology and Political Science (380 citations), Public Administration (18 citations), Political Science and International Relations (99 citations), Education (105 citations) and Urban Studies (20 citations). Dennis Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Raymond Boudon, Robert K. Schaeffer, Robert Booth Fowler, Sue Wright, Eric J. Evans, Gerard E. D’Souza, Daniel J. Miller, Ken Semmens, G. R. Batho and John Bokina. Their work appears in journals such as The Sociological Review, Current Sociology, British Journal of Sociology, The American Historical Review and Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact