Denise Cunningham

1.4k citations
34 papers · 682 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Denise Cunningham

32 papers receiving 659 citations

Peers

Denise Cunningham
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Ophthalmology 417
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 130
  • Aging 6
  • Molecular Biology 181
  • Neurology 20
Replace Danuta Karczewicz with:
Danuta Karczewicz Poland
Allan A. Hunter United States
Andrea J. Richardson Australia
George Kitsos Greece
Giuseppe de Crecchio Italy
Parveen Sen India
Maria Vadalà Italy
Angela J. Cree United Kingdom
Khin Zaw Aung Australia
Hyungwoo Lee South Korea
Denise Cunningham relative to Danuta Karczewicz Poland Danuta Karczewicz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Danuta Karczewicz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Denise Cunningham

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Denise Cunningham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Denise Cunningham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Denise Cunningham more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Denise Cunningham

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Denise Cunningham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Denise Cunningham. The network helps show where Denise Cunningham may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Denise Cunningham, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Denise Cunningham Line = papers co-authored together Denise Cunningham links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010105
2 200975
3 201067
4 201364
5 201461
6 201353
7 201638
8 201327
9 199626
10 198425
11 201922
12 201016
13 199515
14
An image-processing program for automated counting
199614
15 199412
16 202411
17 20208
18 20155
19 20105
20 20124

About Denise Cunningham

Denise Cunningham is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Molecular Biology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Neurology and Infectious Diseases, having authored 34 papers that have together received 682 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Retinal Diseases and Treatments (11 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (7 papers), Retinal Development and Disorders (5 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (3 papers), Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders (2 papers), melanin and skin pigmentation (2 papers), Disaster Response and Management (2 papers) and Viral Infections and Outbreaks Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (417 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (130 citations), Aging (6 citations), Molecular Biology (181 citations) and Neurology (20 citations). Denise Cunningham has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Wai T. Wong, Emily Y. Chew, Catherine A. Cukras, Frederick L. Ferris, Molly Harrington, Keri Hammel, Farzin Forooghian, Robert B. Nussenblatt, H. Nida Sen and Robert F. Bonner. Their work appears in journals such as Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Retina, American Journal of Ophthalmology, Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Ophthalmology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact