Denis Sinor
Impact in
- Anthropology top 2%
- Eurasian Exchange Networks
- Classics top 2%
- Byzantine Studies and History
Papers in
- Anthropology 27
- Eurasian Exchange Networks 23
-
- Linguistics and Cultural Studies 20
- Linguistics and language evolution 15
- Co-authors
- Nicholas Poppe (1 shared paper)Fredrik T. Hiebert (1 shared paper)Richard Foltz (1 shared paper)Igor de Rachewiltz (2 shared papers)Morris Rossabi (1 shared paper)Colin Mackerras (1 shared paper)Herbert Franke (1 shared paper)Peter B. Golden (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Oriens (4 papers)The American Historical Review (4 papers)Diogenes (3 papers)Pacific Affairs (3 papers)Journal of the American Oriental Society (10 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Denis Sinor
42 papers receiving 292 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
- Anthropology 221
- Classics 71
- Archeology 13
- Language and Linguistics 126
- Paleontology 66
Countries citing papers authored by Denis Sinor
This map shows the geographic impact of Denis Sinor's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Denis Sinor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Denis Sinor more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Denis Sinor
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Denis Sinor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Denis Sinor. The network helps show where Denis Sinor may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 17 scholars most cited alongside Denis Sinor, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 59 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1990 | 81 | |
| 2 | 1956 | 69 | |
| 3 | 1997 | 56 | |
| 4 | 2000 | 30 | |
| 5 | 1988 | 20 | |
| 6 | 1976 | 19 | |
| 7 | Horse and pasture in Inner Asian history | 1972 | 18 |
| 8 | 1991 | 17 | |
| 9 | 1969 | 17 | |
| 10 | Uralic and Altaic Series | 1996 | 15 |
| 11 | Inner Asia and its contacts with medieval Europe | 1977 | 11 |
| 12 | 1976 | 11 | |
| 13 | 1961 | 7 | |
| 14 | 1971 | 7 | |
| 15 | History of Hungary | 1959 | 7 |
| 16 | The Mongols and Western Europe | 1975 | 7 |
| 17 | 1982 | 6 | |
| 18 | 1981 | 6 | |
| 19 | 1952 | 6 | |
| 20 | 1956 | 5 |
About Denis Sinor
Denis Sinor is a scholar working on Anthropology, Language and Linguistics, Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations and History, having authored 59 papers that have together received 461 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Eurasian Exchange Networks (23 papers), Linguistics and Cultural Studies (20 papers), Linguistics and language evolution (15 papers), Chinese history and philosophy (10 papers), China's Ethnic Minorities and Relations (6 papers), Soviet and Russian History (5 papers), Historical Geopolitical and Social Dynamics (5 papers) and Historical and Archaeological Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (221 citations), Classics (71 citations), Archeology (13 citations), Language and Linguistics (126 citations) and Paleontology (66 citations). Denis Sinor has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Nicholas Poppe, Fredrik T. Hiebert, Richard Foltz, Igor de Rachewiltz, Morris Rossabi, Colin Mackerras, Herbert Franke, Peter B. Golden, A. K. Narain and А. П. Окладников. Their work appears in journals such as Oriens, The American Historical Review, Diogenes, Pacific Affairs and Journal of the American Oriental Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.