Denis McLean

839 citations
9 papers · 676 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Denis McLean

9 papers receiving 666 citations

Peers

Denis McLean
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 470
  • Biomedical Engineering 247
  • Mechanics of Materials 88
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 45
  • Cell Biology 35
Replace Katrin Brauer with:
Katrin Brauer United Kingdom
Kim Thomson United Kingdom
Sebastian Wojcinski Germany
Yuxin Jiang China
Chenyang Zhao China
Yu‐Mee Sohn South Korea
Hatsuko Nasu Japan
Chae Yeon Lyou South Korea
Hai-Yun Yang China
Stephen Lang United Kingdom
Denis McLean relative to Katrin Brauer United Kingdom Katrin Brauer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Katrin Brauer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Denis McLean

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Denis McLean's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Denis McLean with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Denis McLean more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Denis McLean

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Denis McLean. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Denis McLean. The network helps show where Denis McLean may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Denis McLean, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Denis McLean Line = papers co-authored together Denis McLean links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1 2010374
2 2012220
3 201533
4 201022
5
The Prickly Pair: Making Nationalism in Australia and New Zealand
20039
6 20168
7 20115
8 20094
9 20141

About Denis McLean

Denis McLean is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Political Science and International Relations, Neurology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 9 papers that have together received 676 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ultrasound Imaging and Elastography (4 papers), Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (2 papers), Neurological disorders and treatments (1 paper), MRI in cancer diagnosis (1 paper), Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (1 paper), Australian History and Society (1 paper), AI in cancer detection (1 paper) and Commonwealth, Australian Politics and Federalism (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (470 citations), Biomedical Engineering (247 citations), Mechanics of Materials (88 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (45 citations) and Cell Biology (35 citations). Denis McLean has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Italy and United States. Frequent co-authors include Kim Thomson, Andrew Evans, Colin A. Purdie, Lee B. Jordan, Katrin Brauer, Lee D. Baker, Alastair Thompson, Petra Rauchhaus, Sarah Vinnicombe and Elisabetta Giannotti. Their work appears in journals such as Breast Cancer Research, NMR in Biomedicine, Clinical Radiology, Journal of Clinical Pathology and Radiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact