Deng Wu

1.3k citations
26 papers · 283 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

    • RNA modifications and cancer 4
    • Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks 4
    • RNA Research and Splicing 3
    • Circular RNAs in diseases 2
    • Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research 4
    • MicroRNA in disease regulation 2

Deng Wu

26 papers receiving 281 citations

Peers

Deng Wu
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Cancer Research 64
  • Aging 7
  • Neurology 24
  • Molecular Biology 176
  • Epidemiology 42
Replace Mohanad Gabani with:
Mohanad Gabani United States
Xuerong Sun China
Emily A. King United States
Wanwen Cheng China
Xiaoye Mo China
Eui-Hwan Choi South Korea
Rokhsana Mortuza Canada
María Soledad Álvarez Spain
Hyeon‐Ji Kang South Korea
Deng Wu relative to Mohanad Gabani United States Mohanad Gabani's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×27×
Mohanad Gabani · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Deng Wu

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Deng Wu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Deng Wu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Deng Wu more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Deng Wu

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Deng Wu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Deng Wu. The network helps show where Deng Wu may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Deng Wu, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Deng Wu Line = papers co-authored together Deng Wu links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201554
2 201531
3 201424
4 202322
5 201818
6 202017
7 201915
8 202414
9 201512
10 202310
11 20249
12 20218
13 20147
14 20147
15 20236
16 20145
17 20005
18 20144
19 20233
20 20252

About Deng Wu

Deng Wu is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cancer Research, Genetics, Epidemiology and Neurology, having authored 26 papers that have together received 283 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research (4 papers), RNA modifications and cancer (4 papers), Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks (4 papers), RNA Research and Splicing (3 papers), Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (3 papers), MicroRNA in disease regulation (2 papers), Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity (2 papers) and Circular RNAs in diseases (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (64 citations), Aging (7 citations), Neurology (24 citations), Molecular Biology (176 citations) and Epidemiology (42 citations). Deng Wu has collaborated with scholars based in China, Hong Kong and United States. Frequent co-authors include Xiaoman Bi, Kongning Li, Hei‐Man Chow, Nana Jin, Dong Wang, Yan Huang, Jianzhen Xu, Xia Li, Ting Zhang and Lu Zhang. Their work appears in journals such as Aging Cell, BioMed Research International, Scientific Reports, Cancer Medicine and Molecular BioSystems.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact