Declan Roche
Impact in
- Law top 2%
- Law in Society and Culture
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
Papers in
- Law 5
- Law in Society and Culture 3
- Judicial and Constitutional Studies 1
-
- Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis 4
- Co-authors
- John Parkinson (1 shared paper)Simon Bronitt (2 shared papers)Philip Lambert (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Economy and Society (1 paper)Journal of Social Issues (1 paper)The British Journal of Criminology (1 paper)Contemporary Justice Review (1 paper)The International Journal of Evidence & Proof (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustralia
In The Last Decade
Declan Roche
12 papers receiving 228 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
- Law 71
- Clinical Psychology 98
- Sociology and Political Science 220
- Political Science and International Relations 64
- Public Administration 9
Countries citing papers authored by Declan Roche
This map shows the geographic impact of Declan Roche's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Declan Roche with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Declan Roche more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Declan Roche
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Declan Roche. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Declan Roche. The network helps show where Declan Roche may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 3 scholars most cited alongside Declan Roche, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2003 | 158 | |
| 2 | 2006 | 37 | |
| 3 | 2005 | 26 | |
| 4 | 2004 | 22 | |
| 5 | 2003 | 14 | |
| 6 | 2001 | 13 | |
| 7 | Between rhetoric and reality: sociolegal and republican perspectives on entrapment | 2000 | 12 |
| 8 | 2015 | 7 | |
| 9 | 2001 | 3 | |
| 10 | 2003 | 1 | |
| 11 | 2003 | 1 | |
| 12 | 2017 | 1 |
About Declan Roche
Declan Roche is a scholar working on Law, Sociology and Political Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Political Science and International Relations and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 12 papers that have together received 295 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (4 papers), Law in Society and Culture (3 papers), Vitamin D Research Studies (1 paper), Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses (1 paper), International Law and Human Rights (1 paper), Judicial and Constitutional Studies (1 paper), Global Peace and Security Dynamics (1 paper) and Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Law (71 citations), Clinical Psychology (98 citations), Sociology and Political Science (220 citations), Political Science and International Relations (64 citations) and Public Administration (9 citations). Declan Roche has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include John Parkinson, Simon Bronitt and Philip Lambert. Their work appears in journals such as Economy and Society, Journal of Social Issues, The British Journal of Criminology, Contemporary Justice Review and The International Journal of Evidence & Proof.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.