Chae M. Jaynes

402 citations
28 papers · 232 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Chae M. Jaynes

25 papers receiving 226 citations

Peers

Chae M. Jaynes
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
  • General Decision Sciences 8
  • Sociology and Political Science 166
  • Political Science and International Relations 51
  • Clinical Psychology 31
  • Health 11
Replace George J. Bryjak with:
George J. Bryjak United States
Jacobus Cilliers United States
Philippe Meirieu France
Dermot P. J. Walsh Ireland
Patrick Kinkade United States
Dieter Hermann Germany
J.V. Roberts United Kingdom
Antônio Álvaro Soares Zuin Brazil
Gaston Pineau France
Jeremy Horder United Kingdom
Chae M. Jaynes relative to George J. Bryjak United States George J. Bryjak's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×30×35×
George J. Bryjak · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Chae M. Jaynes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chae M. Jaynes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chae M. Jaynes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chae M. Jaynes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chae M. Jaynes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chae M. Jaynes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chae M. Jaynes. The network helps show where Chae M. Jaynes may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Chae M. Jaynes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Chae M. Jaynes Line = papers co-authored together Chae M. Jaynes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201737
2 202134
3 202322
4 202118
5 202017
6 202016
7 202312
8 202110
9 20209
10 20208
11 20188
12 20196
13 20225
14 20225
15 20215
16 20214
17 20223
18 20243
19 20232
20 20222

About Chae M. Jaynes

Chae M. Jaynes is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Gender Studies, having authored 28 papers that have together received 232 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Crime Patterns and Interventions (20 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (10 papers), Policing Practices and Perceptions (7 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (4 papers), Deception detection and forensic psychology (4 papers), Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies (4 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (3 papers) and Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (8 citations), Sociology and Political Science (166 citations), Political Science and International Relations (51 citations), Clinical Psychology (31 citations) and Health (11 citations). Chae M. Jaynes has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Brazil and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Richard K. Moule, Theodore Wilson, Ray Paternoster, George W. Burruss, Kristin Turney, Dylan B. Jackson, Alexander Testa, Mateus Rennó Santos, Thomas A. Loughran and Megan M. Parry. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, Crime & Delinquency, Journal of Criminal Justice, Criminal Justice and Behavior and Criminology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact