Deborah Turner

28 papers receiving 401 citations

Peers

Deborah Turner
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
  • Library and Information Sciences 54
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 89
  • Reproductive Medicine 69
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 13
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 17
Replace Sarah Pickle with:
Sarah Pickle United States
John N. Berry India
Lauren C. Houghton United States
Justo Aznar Spain
H Jagger United States
Michelle Dalton United States
Vaishali Popat United States
Yumi Lee South Korea
Wael Osman United Arab Emirates
Effy Vayena Switzerland
Deborah Turner relative to Sarah Pickle United States Sarah Pickle's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10.8×
Sarah Pickle · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Deborah Turner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Deborah Turner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Deborah Turner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Deborah Turner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Deborah Turner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Deborah Turner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Deborah Turner. The network helps show where Deborah Turner may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Deborah Turner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Deborah Turner Line = papers co-authored together Deborah Turner links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199387
2 198546
3 200744
4 199244
5 198739
6 200326
7 201221
8 198619
9
Perineal hernia repair using human dura.
198715
10 201011
11 198511
12 201811
13
Conceptualizing oral documents
200710
14 198710
15 19897
16 20127
17 19876
18
Investigating oral information.
20105
19 20165
20 20034

About Deborah Turner

Deborah Turner is a scholar working on Information Systems, Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Library and Information Sciences and Communication, having authored 29 papers that have together received 445 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Web and Library Services (6 papers), Library Science and Administration (5 papers), Hormonal and reproductive studies (3 papers), Media, Communication, and Education (3 papers), Library Science and Information Literacy (3 papers), Hormonal Regulation and Hypertension (3 papers), Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (3 papers) and Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Library and Information Sciences (54 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (89 citations), Reproductive Medicine (69 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (13 citations) and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (17 citations). Deborah Turner has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Bangladesh. Frequent co-authors include G. William Chapman, James P. LaPolla, Richard E. Buller, J. Howard Pratt, James A. McAteer, David P. Henry, Barrie Anderson, J Bénda, Tim Gorichanaz and George Davey Smith. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Documentation, Gynecologic Oncology, Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, British Journal of Anaesthesia and Journal of Access Services.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact