Deborah Penava

414 citations
13 papers · 280 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Deborah Penava

13 papers receiving 265 citations

Peers

Deborah Penava
Comparison fields: 5 of 35
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 161
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 59
  • Reproductive Medicine 19
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 61
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 11
Replace Michelle E.M.H. Westerhuis with:
Michelle E.M.H. Westerhuis Netherlands
Tomoko Nakano‐Kobayashi Japan
Kim Campbell Canada
Rossana Orabona Italy
Tsugio Maeda Japan
Robert Aardenburg Netherlands
C. d’Ercole France
Karrie E. Francois United States
Marianna Andreani Italy
Outi Palomäki Finland
Deborah Penava relative to Michelle E.M.H. Westerhuis Netherlands Michelle E.M.H. Westerhuis's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Michelle E.M.H. Westerhuis · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Deborah Penava

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Deborah Penava's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Deborah Penava with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Deborah Penava more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Deborah Penava

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Deborah Penava. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Deborah Penava. The network helps show where Deborah Penava may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Deborah Penava, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Deborah Penava Line = papers co-authored together Deborah Penava links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 2004138
2 200335
3 200426
4 200223
5 200415
6 201812
7 201911
8 200310
9 19994
10 20033
11 20181
12 20001
13 19991

About Deborah Penava

Deborah Penava is a scholar working on Surgery, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Emergency Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Obstetrics and Gynecology, having authored 13 papers that have together received 280 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management (3 papers), Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques (3 papers), Endometriosis Research and Treatment (2 papers), Gestational Diabetes Research and Management (1 paper), Surgical Simulation and Training (1 paper), Gynecological conditions and treatments (1 paper), Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders (1 paper) and Uterine Myomas and Treatments (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (161 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (59 citations), Reproductive Medicine (19 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (61 citations) and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (11 citations). Deborah Penava has collaborated with scholars based in Canada. Frequent co-authors include Renato Natale, Rahi Victory, Orlando da Silva, Bryan S. Richardson, George A. Vilos, Robert Gagnon, Jackie Hollett-Caines, Charles A. McKenzie, Chris Vinden and J. Andrew McClure. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, Obstetric Medicine and The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact