Deborah Nolan

2.5k citations
63 papers · 1.6k · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Deborah Nolan

57 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

Deborah Nolan
Comparison fields: 5 of 138
  • Statistics and Probability 992
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 103
  • Artificial Intelligence 492
  • Finance 125
  • Management Science and Operations Research 166
Replace George W. Cobb with:
George W. Cobb United States
Sharad Borle United States
Péter Majlender Finland
Sangit Chätterjee United States
Linda H. Zhao United States
Ehsan S. Soofi United States
Arjun K. Gupta United States
S. K. Katti United States
Joe Whittaker United Kingdom
Joachim Engel Germany
Deborah Nolan relative to George W. Cobb United States George W. Cobb's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
George W. Cobb · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Deborah Nolan

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Deborah Nolan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Deborah Nolan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Deborah Nolan more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Deborah Nolan

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Deborah Nolan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Deborah Nolan. The network helps show where Deborah Nolan may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Deborah Nolan, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Deborah Nolan Line = papers co-authored together Deborah Nolan links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 63 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1992421
2 1987276
3 2017166
4 1994143
5 2010113
6 198870
7 201545
8 200734
9 200228
10 201326
11 200024
12 200222
13 201321
14 201717
15 198917
16 200216
17 201315
18 199514
19 199411
20 199211

About Deborah Nolan

Deborah Nolan is a scholar working on Statistics and Probability, Artificial Intelligence, Information Systems, Information Systems and Management and Management Science and Operations Research, having authored 63 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Data Analysis with R (21 papers), Statistics Education and Methodologies (19 papers), Scientific Computing and Data Management (4 papers), Data Mining Algorithms and Applications (4 papers), Advanced Statistical Methods and Models (3 papers), Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services (3 papers), Fault Detection and Control Systems (3 papers) and Mathematics, Computing, and Information Processing (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics and Probability (992 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (103 citations), Artificial Intelligence (492 citations), Finance (125 citations) and Management Science and Operations Research (166 citations). Deborah Nolan has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include David Pollard, Duncan Temple Lang, Andrew Gelman, Prabir Burman, Edmond Chow, Jamis J. Perrett, James Stephen Marron, Terence Paul Speed, Robert W. Peters and Stephen R. Shorofsky. Their work appears in journals such as The American Statistician, Statistical Science, Biometrika, Journal of the American Statistical Association and Journal of Time Series Analysis.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact