Deborah Nolan

2.5k citations
43 papers · 1.3k · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Deborah Nolan

39 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Deborah Nolan
Comparison fields: 5 of 137
  • Statistics and Probability 865
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 100
  • Artificial Intelligence 401
  • Finance 118
  • Management Science and Operations Research 144
Replace George W. Cobb with:
George W. Cobb United States
Akimichi Takemura Japan
Glen Meeden United States
Helen MacGillivray Australia
Yasuo Amemiya United States
Joachim Engel Germany
Bernhard Klar Germany
M. S. Nikulin France
Gongjun Xu United States
S. K. Katti United States
Deborah Nolan relative to George W. Cobb United States George W. Cobb's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
George W. Cobb · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Deborah Nolan

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Deborah Nolan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Deborah Nolan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Deborah Nolan more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Deborah Nolan

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Deborah Nolan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Deborah Nolan. The network helps show where Deborah Nolan may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Deborah Nolan, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Deborah Nolan Line = papers co-authored together Deborah Nolan links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1992399
2 1987266
3 1994130
4 2010101
5 198865
6
Teaching Statistics: A Bag of Tricks
200245
7 201538
8 200730
9 200224
10 200221
11 200021
12 201319
13 200216
14 201715
15 198915
16 199512
17 199211
18 199410
19 20139
20 20208

About Deborah Nolan

Deborah Nolan is a scholar working on Statistics and Probability, Artificial Intelligence, Education, Control and Systems Engineering and Management Science and Operations Research, having authored 43 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Statistics Education and Methodologies (14 papers), Data Analysis with R (10 papers), Advanced Statistical Methods and Models (3 papers), Fault Detection and Control Systems (3 papers), Statistical Methods and Inference (2 papers), Control Systems and Identification (2 papers), Data Visualization and Analytics (2 papers) and Genetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics and Probability (865 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (100 citations), Artificial Intelligence (401 citations), Finance (118 citations) and Management Science and Operations Research (144 citations). Deborah Nolan has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include David Pollard, Duncan Temple Lang, Andrew Gelman, Edmond Chow, Prabir Burman, Jamis J. Perrett, Terence P. Speed, J. S. Marron, Samuel E. Buttrey and Robert W. Peters. Their work appears in journals such as The American Statistician, Journal of the American Statistical Association, Biometrika, Statistical Science and Probability Theory and Related Fields.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact