Deborah Nahom
Impact in
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
Papers in
-
- Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health 5
-
- HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions 4
- Co-authors
- Dominick L. Frosch (3 shared papers)Steven Shoptaw (3 shared papers)Murray E. Jarvik (2 shared papers)Marilyn J. Hoppe (4 shared papers)Diane M. Morrison (4 shared papers)Anthony Wilsdon (5 shared papers)Elizabeth A. Wells (3 shared papers)Mary Rogers Gillmore (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Adolescent Health (2 papers)Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology (2 papers)Journal of Marriage and the Family (1 paper)Journal of School Health (1 paper)The Journal of Sex Research (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Deborah Nahom
9 papers receiving 487 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
- General Health Professions 206
- Applied Psychology 31
- Physiology 132
- Gender Studies 48
- Clinical Psychology 89
Countries citing papers authored by Deborah Nahom
This map shows the geographic impact of Deborah Nahom's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Deborah Nahom with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Deborah Nahom more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Deborah Nahom
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Deborah Nahom. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Deborah Nahom. The network helps show where Deborah Nahom may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 15 scholars most cited alongside Deborah Nahom, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2002 | 120 | |
| 2 | 2000 | 91 | |
| 3 | 2000 | 90 | |
| 4 | 2005 | 88 | |
| 5 | 2001 | 54 | |
| 6 | 2004 | 39 | |
| 7 | 2002 | 31 | |
| 8 | 2005 | 7 | |
| 9 | 2004 | 4 |
About Deborah Nahom
Deborah Nahom is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Infectious Diseases, Clinical Psychology, Epidemiology and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 9 papers that have together received 524 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (5 papers), HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (4 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (3 papers), Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects (2 papers), Smoking Behavior and Cessation (2 papers), Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (2 papers), Sex work and related issues (1 paper) and Behavioral Health and Interventions (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Health Professions (206 citations), Applied Psychology (31 citations), Physiology (132 citations), Gender Studies (48 citations) and Clinical Psychology (89 citations). Deborah Nahom has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Dominick L. Frosch, Steven Shoptaw, Murray E. Jarvik, Marilyn J. Hoppe, Diane M. Morrison, Anthony Wilsdon, Elizabeth A. Wells, Mary Rogers Gillmore, Elise Murowchick and Matthew E. Archibald. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Adolescent Health, Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, Journal of Marriage and the Family, Journal of School Health and The Journal of Sex Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.