Deborah Hellman

41 papers receiving 600 citations

Peers

Deborah Hellman
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
  • Health Informatics 18
  • Safety Research 114
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 181
  • Law 65
  • General Health Professions 132
Replace Mark Sheehan with:
Mark Sheehan United Kingdom
Herman Nys Belgium
Jean V. McHale United Kingdom
Ciara Staunton South Africa
Hendriks Netherlands
Marc A. Rodwin United States
Michelle N. Meyer United States
Vera Lúcia Raposo Portugal
Mohammed Ghaly Qatar
Jacob M. Appel United States
Deborah Hellman relative to Mark Sheehan United Kingdom Mark Sheehan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.9×
Mark Sheehan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Deborah Hellman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Deborah Hellman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Deborah Hellman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Deborah Hellman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Deborah Hellman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Deborah Hellman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Deborah Hellman. The network helps show where Deborah Hellman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside Deborah Hellman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Deborah Hellman Line = papers co-authored together Deborah Hellman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 48 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1991240
2 201174
3
Measuring Algorithmic Fairness
201957
4 200345
5 201334
6 202231
7 200223
8 200018
9 202117
10 200914
11 201714
12 199713
13 201113
14
Genetic Prospects: Essays on Biotechnology, Ethics, and Public Policy
200312
15 201310
16 201710
17
Judging by Appearances: Professional Ethics, Expressive Government, and the Moral Significance of How Things Seem
20019
18 20239
19
Two Concepts of Discrimination
20157
20
PROSECUTING DOCTORS FOR TRUSTING PATIENTS
20095

About Deborah Hellman

Deborah Hellman is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Law, Safety Research and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 48 papers that have together received 706 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Law, Rights, and Freedoms (9 papers), Legal Systems and Judicial Processes (8 papers), Judicial and Constitutional Studies (7 papers), Ethics and Social Impacts of AI (6 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (5 papers), Political Philosophy and Ethics (5 papers), Law in Society and Culture (3 papers) and Legal and Constitutional Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (18 citations), Safety Research (114 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (181 citations), Law (65 citations) and General Health Professions (132 citations). Deborah Hellman has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Italy and India. Frequent co-authors include Samuel Hellmän, Kathleen Creel, Sophia Moreau, David Wasserman, Robert Wachbroit, William A. Galston, Mark Sagoff, Sara Goering, Richard M. Zaner and Paul Β. Thompson. Their work appears in journals such as Minnesota law review, Journal of Moral Philosophy, California Law Review, Virginia Law Review and American Journal of Law & Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact