Deborah Boyle

24 papers receiving 347 citations

Peers

Deborah Boyle
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Research and Theory 17
  • History and Philosophy of Science 59
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 42
  • Leadership and Management 9
  • General Health Professions 118
Replace Deborah A. Whippen with:
Deborah A. Whippen United States
Rosemary L. Hoffmann United States
Joan Such Lockhart United States
Gabriele Müller-Mundt Germany
Monir Mazaheri Sweden
Özlem Akman Türkiye
G. R. Dunstan United Kingdom
Terri Ashcroft Canada
Gamze Teskereci Türkiye
John F. Kilner United States
Deborah Boyle relative to Deborah A. Whippen United States Deborah A. Whippen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×15×20×24×
Deborah A. Whippen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Deborah Boyle

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Deborah Boyle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Deborah Boyle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Deborah Boyle more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Deborah Boyle

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Deborah Boyle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Deborah Boyle. The network helps show where Deborah Boyle may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Deborah Boyle, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Deborah Boyle Line = papers co-authored together Deborah Boyle links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009192
2 200049
3 201526
4 200421
5 202019
6 202015
7 201214
8 202010
9
Enhancing patient adherence to improve outcomes with oral chemotherapy
20079
10 20198
11 20066
12 20124
13 20174
14 20223
15 20203
16 20033
17 20193
18 20182
19 20172
20 20202

About Deborah Boyle

Deborah Boyle is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Religious studies, History, Philosophy and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, having authored 26 papers that have together received 399 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical Philosophy and Science (6 papers), Religion, Gender, and Enlightenment (5 papers), Medical History and Innovations (3 papers), Genital Health and Disease (3 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (2 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (2 papers), Family Support in Illness (2 papers) and Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (17 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (59 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (42 citations), Leadership and Management (9 citations) and General Health Professions (118 citations). Deborah Boyle has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Roy A. Beveridge, Michael Sheridan, Joseph S. Bubalo, Peter E. M. Butler, Aurora Almadori, Wendy M.N. Reid, Victoria J. Swale, Allan MacLean, Chi Wang and Beth A. Plunkett. Their work appears in journals such as Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clinical journal of oncology nursing, British Journal for the History of Philosophy, Philosophy Compass and Dimensions of Critical Care Nursing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact