Deborah Backus

88 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Peers

Deborah Backus
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 880
  • Rehabilitation 287
  • Occupational Therapy 88
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 242
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 76
Replace Charles Benaïm with:
Charles Benaïm France
Dany H. Gagnon Canada
Marco Monticone Italy
Vincent de Groot Netherlands
David Allan United Kingdom
Michel W. Coppieters Australia
Marc B. Rietberg Netherlands
Νικόλαος Στριμπάκος Greece
Calogero Foti Italy
Claes Hultling Sweden
Deborah Backus relative to Charles Benaïm France Charles Benaïm's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.6×
Charles Benaïm · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Deborah Backus

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Deborah Backus's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Deborah Backus with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Deborah Backus more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Deborah Backus

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Deborah Backus. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Deborah Backus. The network helps show where Deborah Backus may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Deborah Backus, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Deborah Backus Line = papers co-authored together Deborah Backus links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 92 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013164
2 201181
3 201474
4 201367
5 201264
6 201158
7 201054
8 200254
9 200952
10 201650
11 200949
12 200547
13 201646
14 201740
15 201139
16 201437
17 201936
18 201134
19 201632
20 200728

About Deborah Backus

Deborah Backus is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Psychiatry and Mental health, Rehabilitation, Biomedical Engineering and General Health Professions, having authored 92 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spinal Cord Injury Research (29 papers), Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (23 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (14 papers), Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (14 papers), Muscle activation and electromyography studies (7 papers), Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation (5 papers), Motor Control and Adaptation (4 papers) and EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (880 citations), Rehabilitation (287 citations), Occupational Therapy (88 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (242 citations) and Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (76 citations). Deborah Backus has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Korea and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Kevin K. McCully, Julie Gassaway, Jeanne M. Zanca, Randall J. Smout, Terence E. Ryan, Michael L. Jones, Candace Tefertiller, Gary S. Russo, Susan D. Horn and Allen W. Heinemann. Their work appears in journals such as Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, International Journal of MS Care, Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation, Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders and Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact