Dean Jolly

24 papers receiving 400 citations

Peers

Dean Jolly
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Pharmaceutical Science 70
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 186
  • Radiation 50
  • Biological Psychiatry 12
  • Neurology 33
Replace Dirk Roeda with:
Dirk Roeda France
Paresh J. Kothari United States
Bernard Schmall United States
Р. Н. Красикова Russia
Françoise Vaufrey France
М. V. Gulyaev Russia
Carl-Göran Stålnacke Sweden
Filomena Mattner Australia
Johan Ulin Sweden
Kazuhiko Yanamoto Japan
Dean Jolly relative to Dirk Roeda France Dirk Roeda's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Dirk Roeda · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dean Jolly

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dean Jolly's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dean Jolly with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dean Jolly more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dean Jolly

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dean Jolly. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dean Jolly. The network helps show where Dean Jolly may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Dean Jolly, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dean Jolly Line = papers co-authored together Dean Jolly links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200952
2 198350
3 200340
4 196339
5 200928
6 199524
7 200824
8 195620
9 199919
10 198419
11 198516
12 198616
13 198215
14 198612
15 201711
16 196211
17 19627
18 20167
19 19865
20 20144

About Dean Jolly

Dean Jolly is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Molecular Biology, Pharmaceutical Science, Physiology and Cancer Research, having authored 26 papers that have together received 427 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (11 papers), Fluorine in Organic Chemistry (4 papers), Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism (4 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (2 papers), Click Chemistry and Applications (2 papers), Amino Acid Enzymes and Metabolism (2 papers), Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases (2 papers) and Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmaceutical Science (70 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (186 citations), Radiation (50 citations), Biological Psychiatry (12 citations) and Neurology (33 citations). Dean Jolly has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Mirko Dikšić, Ralf Schirrmacher, E. T. Mertz, R. N. Saunders, Christopher J. Thompson, Alexander Thiel, Nan Zhang, Esther Schirrmacher, Paul Lyon and Jean‐Paul Soucy. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, Experimental Biology and Medicine, Applied Radiation and Isotopes, Nuclear Medicine and Biology and Clinical Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact