Dawn Prentice

1.0k citations
39 papers · 704 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Dawn Prentice

37 papers receiving 643 citations

Peers

Dawn Prentice
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
  • Research and Theory 97
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 61
  • Leadership and Management 40
  • General Health Professions 393
  • Family Practice 26
Replace Rebecca S. Miltner with:
Rebecca S. Miltner United States
Siti Zubaidah Mordiffi Singapore
Helen Walthall United Kingdom
Michelle Lalonde Canada
Katarína Žiaková Slovakia
John Rolley Australia
Einav Srulovici Israel
Martha Keehner Engelke United States
Maria Adriana Henriques Portugal
Susan Corbridge United States
Dawn Prentice relative to Rebecca S. Miltner United States Rebecca S. Miltner's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.7×
Rebecca S. Miltner · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dawn Prentice

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dawn Prentice's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dawn Prentice with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dawn Prentice more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dawn Prentice

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dawn Prentice. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dawn Prentice. The network helps show where Dawn Prentice may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Dawn Prentice, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dawn Prentice Line = papers co-authored together Dawn Prentice links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201490
2 201971
3 200366
4 201357
5 201549
6 201039
7 202126
8 201226
9 200725
10 201519
11 201519
12 201919
13 201417
14 201617
15 199913
16 200913
17 201112
18 202011
19 201511
20 201610

About Dawn Prentice

Dawn Prentice is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, Surgery and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 39 papers that have together received 704 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (17 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (13 papers), Nursing Roles and Practices (5 papers), Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (5 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (5 papers), Clinical practice guidelines implementation (5 papers), Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (3 papers) and Ethics in medical practice (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (97 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (61 citations), Leadership and Management (40 citations), General Health Professions (393 citations) and Family Practice (26 citations). Dawn Prentice has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Joyce M. Engel, Julie Moreland, Margaret Black, Mary Ann O’Brien, Rosemary Anderson, Charlie H. Goldsmith, Maria Huijbregts, Karen Brunton, Joanne Crawford and Véronique Boscart. Their work appears in journals such as Nursing Forum, Journal of Clinical Nursing, Global Qualitative Nursing Research, International Journal of Older People Nursing and Journal of Nursing Education.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact