Da‐Wei Huang

4.5k citations
191 papers · 2.9k · h-index 30

Impact in

Papers in

Da‐Wei Huang

183 papers receiving 2.8k citations

Peers

Da‐Wei Huang
Comparison fields: 5 of 156
  • Insect Science 989
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 656
  • Horticulture 19
  • Pollution 206
  • Plant Science 635
Replace Xiaoping Wang with:
Xiaoping Wang China
Lidia S. Watrud United States
Dick Roelofs Netherlands
Andrea Squartini Italy
Hong Wang China
Pieter Spanoghe Belgium
Zonghua Wang China
Sandeep Kumar India
Xian‐Ying Meng Japan
Gautam Sarath United States
Da‐Wei Huang relative to Xiaoping Wang China Xiaoping Wang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.0×
Xiaoping Wang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Da‐Wei Huang

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Da‐Wei Huang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Da‐Wei Huang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Da‐Wei Huang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Da‐Wei Huang

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Da‐Wei Huang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Da‐Wei Huang. The network helps show where Da‐Wei Huang may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Da‐Wei Huang, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Da‐Wei Huang Line = papers co-authored together Da‐Wei Huang links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 191 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015241
2 2014121
3 2016113
4 201295
5 200577
6 201158
7 200954
8 201152
9 201247
10 199444
11
A Taxonomic Study of Chinese Species of Ooencyrtus (Insecta: Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae)
200542
12 201040
13 201840
14 200937
15 202136
16 201636
17 201236
18 202036
19 201735
20 201835

About Da‐Wei Huang

Da‐Wei Huang is a scholar working on Insect Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Molecular Biology, Genetics and Plant Science, having authored 191 papers that have together received 2.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant and animal studies (63 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (38 papers), Hymenoptera taxonomy and phylogeny (31 papers), Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences (28 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (25 papers), Insect Utilization and Effects (19 papers), Plant Parasitism and Resistance (15 papers) and Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (14 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (989 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (656 citations), Horticulture (19 citations), Pollution (206 citations) and Plant Science (635 citations). Da‐Wei Huang has collaborated with scholars based in China, Canada and Taiwan. Frequent co-authors include Jinhua Xiao, Robert W. Murphy, Chao‐Dong Zhu, Shunmin He, Peng Zhang, Runsheng Chen, Yan‐Zhou Zhang, Li‐Ming Niu, John La Salle and Jiajia Wang. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Microbiology, PLoS ONE, Zoological studies, Scientific Reports and Insect Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact