David Woods

8.0k citations
231 papers · 5.6k · 1 hit paper · h-index 38

Impact in

Papers in

David Woods

184 papers receiving 5.2k citations

David Woods's Hit Papers

Acetone-butanol fermentation revisited 1986 · 1.4k citations
1.4k0+13+26Years since publication4008001.2k

Peers

David Woods
Comparison fields: 5 of 196
  • Molecular Medicine 372
  • Biotechnology 504
  • Biomedical Engineering 2.1k
  • Molecular Biology 2.6k
  • Classics 89
Replace Wolfgang Bauer with:
Wolfgang Bauer Austria
David Summers United Kingdom
R. Malcolm Brown United States
Yanmei Li China
David P. Clark United States
Matthew Wook Chang Singapore
Joan L. Slonczewski United States
Jin He China
Shengyue Wang China
Markus B. Linder Finland
David Woods relative to Wolfgang Bauer Austria Wolfgang Bauer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×22.3×
Wolfgang Bauer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Woods

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Woods's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Woods with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Woods more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Woods

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Woods. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Woods. The network helps show where David Woods may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Woods, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Woods Line = papers co-authored together David Woods links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 231 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Acetone-butanol fermentation revisited
Hit paper breakdown →
19861397
2 1994372
3 1968232
4 1982150
5
The clostridia and biotechnology.
1993108
6 200092
7 197377
8 196973
9 199172
10 198968
11 199567
12 199165
13 198957
14 197956
15 198854
16 198252
17 198852
18 199351
19 198950
20 198750

About David Woods

David Woods is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Anthropology, Archeology, Classics and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 231 papers that have together received 5.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Classical Antiquity Studies (45 papers), Byzantine Studies and History (33 papers), Historical and Religious Studies of Rome (24 papers), Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology (21 papers), Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction (16 papers), Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (15 papers), Biofuel production and bioconversion (14 papers) and Enzyme Production and Characterization (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Molecular Medicine (372 citations), Biotechnology (504 citations), Biomedical Engineering (2.1k citations), Molecular Biology (2.6k citations) and Classics (89 citations). David Woods has collaborated with scholars based in South Africa, Ireland and Canada. Frequent co-authors include David T. Jones, A. E. Hamielec, E. A. Bevan, Douglas E. Rawlings, David Jones, Xiao Yu Wu, Robert Pelton, W. A. Jones, Susan K. De Long and Sharon J. Reid. Their work appears in journals such as Applied and Environmental Microbiology, Journal of Bacteriology, Mnemosyne, Microbiology and Vigiliae Christianae.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact