David Wolber

1.4k citations
28 papers · 823 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

David Wolber

27 papers receiving 728 citations

Peers

David Wolber
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Computer Science Applications 354
  • Software 78
  • Signal Processing 150
  • Human-Computer Interaction 76
  • Computer Networks and Communications 267
Replace Michał Moskal with:
Michał Moskal United States
Curtis A. Carver United States
Chris McDonald Australia
Eli Tilevich United States
Peli de Halleux United States
Geber Ramalho Brazil
Andreas Stefik United States
Martin C. Carlisle United States
Andrea Mocci Switzerland
David Umphress United States
David Wolber relative to Michał Moskal United States Michał Moskal's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Michał Moskal · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Wolber

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Wolber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Wolber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Wolber more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Wolber

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Wolber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Wolber. The network helps show where David Wolber may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside David Wolber, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Wolber Line = papers co-authored together David Wolber links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1990230
2 2011133
3
App Inventor: Create Your Own Android Apps
201188
4 201362
5 201557
6 201236
7 201425
8 201023
9 199122
10 199221
11 201421
12 199719
13 200016
14 199615
15 200212
16 20028
17 20148
18
App Inventor 2
20145
19 20125
20
Reviving Functional Decomposition in Object-Oriented Design.
19973

About David Wolber

David Wolber is a scholar working on Computer Science Applications, Information Systems, Software, Artificial Intelligence and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, having authored 28 papers that have together received 823 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Teaching and Learning Programming (16 papers), Mobile Learning in Education (6 papers), Mobile and Web Applications (5 papers), Software Engineering Research (3 papers), Interactive and Immersive Displays (3 papers), Model-Driven Software Engineering Techniques (2 papers), Human Motion and Animation (2 papers) and Spreadsheets and End-User Computing (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Science Applications (354 citations), Software (78 citations), Signal Processing (150 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (76 citations) and Computer Networks and Communications (267 citations). David Wolber has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include L.T. Heberlein, Gihan Dias, Jason M. Wood, Karl Levitt, Biswanath Mukherjee, Hal Abelson, Ellen Spertus, Jeff Gray, Mark B. Friedman and Harold Abelson. Their work appears in journals such as Communications of the ACM, ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, GetMobile Mobile Computing and Communications, Medical Entomology and Zoology and Journal of computing sciences in colleges.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact