David Wolber

1.3k citations
25 papers · 780 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

David Wolber

24 papers receiving 690 citations

Peers

David Wolber
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Computer Science Applications 346
  • Software 75
  • Signal Processing 144
  • Human-Computer Interaction 63
  • Computer Networks and Communications 260
Replace Michał Moskal with:
Michał Moskal United States
Curtis A. Carver United States
Chris McDonald Australia
Eli Tilevich United States
Geber Ramalho Brazil
Peli de Halleux United States
Martin C. Carlisle United States
Andreas Stefik United States
David Umphress United States
Frank Klassner United States
David Wolber relative to Michał Moskal United States Michał Moskal's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Michał Moskal · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Wolber

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Wolber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Wolber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Wolber more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Wolber

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Wolber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Wolber. The network helps show where David Wolber may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside David Wolber, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Wolber Line = papers co-authored together David Wolber links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1990230
2 2011132
3
App Inventor: Create Your Own Android Apps
201187
4 201361
5 201557
6 201236
7 201425
8 201023
9 199122
10 201420
11 199719
12 200015
13 200212
14 20148
15 20028
16 20125
17
App Inventor 2
20145
18
Reviving Functional Decomposition in Object-Oriented Design.
19973
19 20063
20 20133

About David Wolber

David Wolber is a scholar working on Computer Science Applications, Information Systems, Software, Artificial Intelligence and Computer Networks and Communications, having authored 25 papers that have together received 780 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Teaching and Learning Programming (15 papers), Mobile Learning in Education (6 papers), Mobile and Web Applications (5 papers), Software Testing and Debugging Techniques (2 papers), Interactive and Immersive Displays (2 papers), Software Engineering Research (2 papers), Human Motion and Animation (2 papers) and Spreadsheets and End-User Computing (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Science Applications (346 citations), Software (75 citations), Signal Processing (144 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (63 citations) and Computer Networks and Communications (260 citations). David Wolber has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Karl Levitt, Jason M. Wood, Biswanath Mukherjee, L.T. Heberlein, Gihan Dias, Hal Abelson, Ellen Spertus, Jeff Gray, Harold Abelson and Mark B. Friedman. Their work appears in journals such as ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, Communications of the ACM, Journal of computing sciences in colleges, Medical Entomology and Zoology and GetMobile Mobile Computing and Communications.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact