David Wakeham
Impact in
-
- Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
- Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 5%
- Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
- Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
- Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Papers in
-
- Cosmology and Gravitation Theories 5
-
- Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories 5
- Co-authors
- James Sully (3 shared papers)Mark Van Raamsdonk (3 shared papers)Moshe Rozali (3 shared papers)Chris Waddell (2 shared papers)Jason Pollack (2 shared papers)Brian Swingle (1 shared paper)Lyndal Henden (1 shared paper)Melanie Bahlo (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of High Energy Physics (3 papers)Classical and Quantum Gravity (2 papers)Bioinformatics (1 paper)Quantum (1 paper)Physical Review Letters (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesItaly
In The Last Decade
David Wakeham
8 papers receiving 364 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 28
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 329
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 301
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 192
- Computational Mathematics 2
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 78
Countries citing papers authored by David Wakeham
This map shows the geographic impact of David Wakeham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Wakeham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Wakeham more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David Wakeham
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Wakeham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Wakeham. The network helps show where David Wakeham may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 12 scholars most cited alongside David Wakeham, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2020 | 114 | |
| 2 | 2019 | 80 | |
| 3 | 2021 | 74 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 64 | |
| 5 | 2021 | 13 | |
| 6 | 2016 | 11 | |
| 7 | 2025 | 4 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 4 |
About David Wakeham
David Wakeham is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 8 papers that have together received 364 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (5 papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (5 papers), Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories (5 papers), Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture (2 papers), Quantum Information and Cryptography (1 paper), Quantum many-body systems (1 paper), Quantum and electron transport phenomena (1 paper) and Quantum Mechanics and Applications (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (329 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (301 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (192 citations), Computational Mathematics (2 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (78 citations). David Wakeham has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Italy. Frequent co-authors include James Sully, Mark Van Raamsdonk, Moshe Rozali, Chris Waddell, Jason Pollack, Brian Swingle, Lyndal Henden, Melanie Bahlo, Utkarsh Azad and Alessandro Roggero. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of High Energy Physics, Classical and Quantum Gravity, Bioinformatics, Quantum and Physical Review Letters.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.