David W. Messinger

2.0k citations
168 papers · 1.6k · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

David W. Messinger

153 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

David W. Messinger
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
  • Media Technology 912
  • Conservation 74
  • Atmospheric Science 294
  • Space and Planetary Science 22
  • Analytical Chemistry 153
Replace Daniele Cerra with:
Daniele Cerra Germany
Jerry E. Solomon United States
Maurice Craig Australia
Stefano Baronti Italy
Giorgio Licciardi Italy
N. Keshava United States
Jacqueline Le Moigne United States
John Kerekes United States
Ralf Reulke Germany
Yoann Altmann United Kingdom
David W. Messinger relative to Daniele Cerra Germany Daniele Cerra's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×7.0×
Daniele Cerra · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David W. Messinger

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David W. Messinger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David W. Messinger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David W. Messinger more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David W. Messinger

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David W. Messinger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David W. Messinger. The network helps show where David W. Messinger may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David W. Messinger, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David W. Messinger Line = papers co-authored together David W. Messinger links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 168 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014143
2 201369
3 201158
4 202057
5 201256
6 200754
7 201449
8 201847
9 202038
10 201137
11 199531
12 201129
13 199728
14 199628
15 201126
16 201025
17 201725
18 200925
19 200622
20 201020

About David W. Messinger

David W. Messinger is a scholar working on Media Technology, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Archeology, Analytical Chemistry and Environmental Engineering, having authored 168 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Remote-Sensing Image Classification (106 papers), Advanced Image Fusion Techniques (37 papers), Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping (22 papers), Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis (22 papers), Infrared Target Detection Methodologies (21 papers), Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses (20 papers), Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques (19 papers) and Remote Sensing in Agriculture (15 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Media Technology (912 citations), Conservation (74 citations), Atmospheric Science (294 citations), Space and Planetary Science (22 citations) and Analytical Chemistry (153 citations). David W. Messinger has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Amanda Ziemann, Bin Chen, Emmett J. Ientilucci, William Basener, John K. Delaney, John R. Schott, W. G. Roberge, Nathan D. Cahill, Carl Salvaggio and John Kerekes. Their work appears in journals such as Optical Engineering, The Astrophysical Journal, Heritage Science, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing and Journal of Cultural Heritage.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact