David Temperley

68 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Peers

David Temperley
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Music 500
  • Signal Processing 935
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 1.1k
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 690
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 277
Replace Geraínt A. Wiggins with:
Geraínt A. Wiggins United Kingdom
Perfecto Herrera Spain
Matthias Mauch United Kingdom
Simon Dixon United Kingdom
Fabien Gouyon Portugal
Bryan Pardo United States
François Pachet Japan
Mikko Kurimo Finland
Douglas Turnbull United States
Frans Wiering Netherlands
David Temperley relative to Geraínt A. Wiggins United Kingdom Geraínt A. Wiggins's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Geraínt A. Wiggins · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Temperley

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Temperley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Temperley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Temperley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Temperley

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Temperley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Temperley. The network helps show where David Temperley may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside David Temperley, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Temperley Line = papers co-authored together David Temperley links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 72 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Parsing English with a Link Grammar
1995424
2 2006159
3 2011125
4 2010108
5 2006100
6 199973
7 199972
8 199971
9 201357
10 200850
11 200050
12 201747
13 200746
14 200345
15 200843
16 200841
17 201239
18 201037
19 200937
20 200234

About David Temperley

David Temperley is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Signal Processing, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Music and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 72 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Music Perception (43 papers), Music and Audio Processing (37 papers), Music Technology and Sound Studies (33 papers), Musicology and Musical Analysis (15 papers), Natural Language Processing Techniques (10 papers), Phonetics and Phonology Research (7 papers), Music History and Culture (7 papers) and Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Music (500 citations), Signal Processing (935 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (1.1k citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (690 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (277 citations). David Temperley has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Daniel D. Sleator, Daniel Gildea, Trevor de Clercq, Elizabeth West Marvin, Nicholas Temperley, Zhiyao Duan, Emmanuel Bigand and Peter Q. Pfordresher. Their work appears in journals such as Music Perception An Interdisciplinary Journal, Journal of Music Theory, Cognitive Science, Popular Music and Music Theory Online.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact