David Speiser

1.1k citations
55 papers · 792 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

David Speiser

45 papers receiving 704 citations

Peers

David Speiser
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Applied Mathematics 304
  • Algebra and Number Theory 99
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 227
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 210
  • Mathematical Physics 120
Replace Steven Shnider with:
Steven Shnider Canada
Andrei I. Davydychev Russia
Bogdan Mielnik Mexico
Alberto Simoni Italy
Jean-Christophe Yoccoz France
Erik Panzer United Kingdom
Alexander V. Kitaev Russia
Людвиг Дмитриевич Фаддеев Russia
E. Onofri Italy
Anatoly Vassilievich Kotikov Russia
David Speiser relative to Steven Shnider Canada Steven Shnider's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×
Steven Shnider · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Speiser

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Speiser's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Speiser with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Speiser more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Speiser

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Speiser. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Speiser. The network helps show where David Speiser may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside David Speiser, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Speiser Line = papers co-authored together David Speiser links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 55 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1962273
2 196398
3 196353
4 198234
5 196432
6 195931
7 196230
8 197428
9 196323
10 196422
11 197422
12 197615
13 196313
14 197912
15 198010
16 19669
17 19718
18 19748
19 19668
20 19967

About David Speiser

David Speiser is a scholar working on Theoretical Computer Science, Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Mathematical Physics, having authored 55 papers that have together received 792 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (9 papers), Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (7 papers), History and Theory of Mathematics (6 papers), High-Energy Particle Collisions Research (6 papers), Relativity and Gravitational Theory (5 papers), Quantum Mechanics and Applications (4 papers), Advanced Mathematical Theories and Applications (4 papers) and Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Mathematics (304 citations), Algebra and Number Theory (99 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (227 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (210 citations) and Mathematical Physics (120 citations). David Speiser has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include J. M. Jauch, David Finkelstein, J. Weyers, Jean-Pierre Antoine, Francis Halzen, R. Gastmans, P. Freund, A. Morales, H. Ruegg and Jean-Louis Basdevant. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review Letters, Journal of Elasticity, Meccanica, Nature and Nexus Network Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact