David Schmidly

1.9k citations
84 papers · 1.2k · h-index 22

Impact in

Papers in

David Schmidly

78 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

David Schmidly
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • Ecological Modeling 281
  • Paleontology 324
  • Ecology 838
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 460
  • Developmental Biology 36
Replace Duke S. Rogers with:
Duke S. Rogers United States
Jerry R. Choate United States
Michael D. Carleton United States
Duane A. Schlitter United States
Dieter Kock Germany
Janet K. Braun United States
J. E. Hill United Kingdom
Rainer Hutterer Germany
Ibnu Maryanto Indonesia
Lon I. Grassman United States
David Schmidly relative to Duke S. Rogers United States Duke S. Rogers's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Duke S. Rogers · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Schmidly

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Schmidly's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Schmidly with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Schmidly more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Schmidly

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Schmidly. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Schmidly. The network helps show where David Schmidly may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Schmidly, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Schmidly Line = papers co-authored together David Schmidly links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 84 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200569
2 200064
3 199258
4 201657
5 197245
6 200339
7 197938
8
The bats of Texas
199137
9 197336
10 198731
11 197430
12 198129
13 198727
14
Bats of Texas
201226
15 200026
16 197926
17 198824
18 198424
19 199922
20 197922

About David Schmidly

David Schmidly is a scholar working on Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Ecological Modeling, Paleontology and Genetics, having authored 84 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (30 papers), Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies (29 papers), Bat Biology and Ecology Studies (25 papers), Evolution and Paleontology Studies (14 papers), Ecology and biodiversity studies (14 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (13 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (13 papers) and Rangeland and Wildlife Management (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (281 citations), Paleontology (324 citations), Ecology (838 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (460 citations) and Developmental Biology (36 citations). David Schmidly has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include Robert D. Bradley, Rodney L. Honeycutt, C. William Kilpatrick, Duke S. Rogers, Irene Tiemann‐Boege, John F. Eisenberg, Michael A. Mares, Troy L. Best, Mark D. Engstrom and Priscilla K. Tucker. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Mammalogy, Mammalian Species, Journal of Wildlife Management, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences and Fisheries.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact