David Schieferdecker

494 citations
18 papers · 89 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

David Schieferdecker

15 papers receiving 87 citations

Peers

David Schieferdecker
Comparison fields: 5 of 33
  • Communication 24
  • Human-Computer Interaction 10
  • Social Psychology 22
  • Applied Psychology 5
  • Literature and Literary Theory 12
Replace Dennis Day with:
Dennis Day Denmark
Britta Schneider Germany
Angela Keppler Germany
Monika Schwarz-Friesel Germany
Elisa Sarda France
Angeliki Athanasiadou Greece
Samu Kytölä Finland
Diane Vincent Canada
Chris Heffer United Kingdom
Alexander Ziem Germany
David Schieferdecker relative to Dennis Day Denmark Dennis Day's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×21×
Dennis Day · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Schieferdecker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Schieferdecker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Schieferdecker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Schieferdecker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Schieferdecker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Schieferdecker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Schieferdecker. The network helps show where David Schieferdecker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside David Schieferdecker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Schieferdecker Line = papers co-authored together David Schieferdecker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 202130
2 201715
3 20248
4 20217
5 20226
6 20216
7 20175
8 20234
9 20242
10 20231
11 20251
12 20231
13 20231
14 20251
15 20141
16 20260
17 20250
18 20220

About David Schieferdecker

David Schieferdecker is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Communication, Political Science and International Relations, Health and Social Psychology, having authored 18 papers that have together received 89 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social Media and Politics (7 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (4 papers), Social Capital and Networks (3 papers), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (2 papers), Populism, Right-Wing Movements (2 papers), Media Influence and Health (2 papers), Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering (2 papers) and Misinformation and Its Impacts (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (24 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (10 citations), Social Psychology (22 citations), Applied Psychology (5 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (12 citations). David Schieferdecker has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Roland Tóth, Hartmut Weßler, Thorsten Faas, Jule Specht, Swen Hutter, Denis Gerstorf, Jannes Jacobsen, Jake Harwood, Rico Neumann and Endre Borbáth. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Public Opinion Research, Annals of the International Communication Association, Communication Studies, VOLUNTAS International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations and Communication Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact