David Runciman
Impact in
- Philosophy top 2%
- Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought
-
- Political Philosophy and Ethics
- Political Theory and Influence
- American Constitutional Law and Politics
- Electoral Systems and Political Participation
- Populism, Right-Wing Movements
- Social Policy and Reform Studies
Papers in
-
- Political Philosophy and Ethics 8
- Political Theory and Influence 3
- Political and Economic history of UK and US 2
-
- Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought 5
- Journals
- Journal of Political Philosophy (3 papers)The Political Quarterly (2 papers)Ethics & International Affairs (1 paper)Contemporary Political Theory (1 paper)The British Journal of Politics and International Relations (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomSouth SudanBelgium
In The Last Decade
David Runciman
46 papers receiving 583 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
- Philosophy 190
- Political Science and International Relations 410
- History 79
- Sociology and Political Science 309
- Law 56
Countries citing papers authored by David Runciman
This map shows the geographic impact of David Runciman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Runciman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Runciman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David Runciman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Runciman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Runciman. The network helps show where David Runciman may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 2 scholars most cited alongside David Runciman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 52 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1997 | 190 | |
| 2 | 2007 | 82 | |
| 3 | 2000 | 67 | |
| 4 | How Democracy Ends | 2018 | 58 |
| 5 | 2011 | 33 | |
| 6 | 2003 | 32 | |
| 7 | 2006 | 28 | |
| 8 | 2009 | 20 | |
| 9 | 2012 | 19 | |
| 10 | 2016 | 17 | |
| 11 | Gleichheit ist Glück | 2010 | 16 |
| 12 | 2010 | 15 | |
| 13 | 2001 | 13 | |
| 14 | 2000 | 11 | |
| 15 | 2003 | 8 | |
| 16 | 2009 | 6 | |
| 17 | 2016 | 6 | |
| 18 | Is this how democracy ends | 2016 | 5 |
| 19 | 2013 | 5 | |
| 20 | 2006 | 5 |
About David Runciman
David Runciman is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science, Strategy and Management and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 52 papers that have together received 697 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Political Philosophy and Ethics (8 papers), Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought (5 papers), Political Theology and Sovereignty (3 papers), Political Theory and Influence (3 papers), Political and Economic history of UK and US (2 papers), Critical Theory and Philosophy (2 papers), State Capitalism and Financial Governance (1 paper) and Medieval Literature and History (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (190 citations), Political Science and International Relations (410 citations), History (79 citations), Sociology and Political Science (309 citations) and Law (56 citations). David Runciman has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, South Sudan and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Frederic William Maitland and Helen Thompson. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Political Philosophy, The Political Quarterly, Ethics & International Affairs, Contemporary Political Theory and The British Journal of Politics and International Relations.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.