David Robben

17 papers receiving 400 citations

Peers

David Robben
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Health Informatics 14
  • Radiation 79
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 191
  • Internal Medicine 17
  • Epidemiology 148
Replace Fuk Tang with:
Fuk Tang Hong Kong
Rahil Shahzad Netherlands
Andreas Fieselmann Germany
Alexander R. Podgorsak United States
Joanne Hoffman United States
Bernhard Renger Germany
Taiki Magome Japan
Mitsutaka Nemoto Japan
Noriko Kikuchi Japan
Fabíola Macruz United States
David Robben relative to Fuk Tang Hong Kong Fuk Tang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.1×
Fuk Tang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Robben

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Robben's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Robben with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Robben more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Robben

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Robben. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Robben. The network helps show where David Robben may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Robben, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Robben Line = papers co-authored together David Robben links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 201978
2 201957
3 202151
4 202047
5 201639
6 202035
7 202122
8 201417
9 201913
10 202012
11 20138
12 20147
13 20187
14 20234
15 20204
16 20212
17
Determination of the cerebral perfusion territories using CT Perfusion imaging
20161
18 20180

About David Robben

David Robben is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 18 papers that have together received 404 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Acute Ischemic Stroke Management (8 papers), Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases (6 papers), Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging (4 papers), Medical Image Segmentation Techniques (4 papers), Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques (3 papers), Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (3 papers), Brain Tumor Detection and Classification (2 papers) and Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (14 citations), Radiation (79 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (191 citations), Internal Medicine (17 citations) and Epidemiology (148 citations). David Robben has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Frederik Maes, Paul Suetens, Wouter Crijns, Sandra Nuyts, Siri Willems, Julie van der Veen, Stefan Sunaert, Vincent Thijs, Jeroen Bertels and Guy Wilms. Their work appears in journals such as Medical Image Analysis, Stroke, PLoS ONE, Radiotherapy and Oncology and European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact