David Reeb

978 citations
22 papers · 685 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

David Reeb

22 papers receiving 680 citations

Peers

David Reeb
Comparison fields: 5 of 20
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 290
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 154
  • Artificial Intelligence 204
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 139
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 62
Replace Sanjib Dey with:
Sanjib Dey India
ChunJun Cao United States
Alessio Belenchia United Kingdom
André Großardt Germany
Amilcar R. de Queiroz Brazil
Hrant Gharibyan United States
Pouria Pedram Iran
Tianci Zhou United States
Minoru Hirayama Japan
Metin Arık Türkiye
David Reeb relative to Sanjib Dey India Sanjib Dey's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.8×
Sanjib Dey · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Reeb

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Reeb's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Reeb with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Reeb more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Reeb

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Reeb. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Reeb. The network helps show where David Reeb may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside David Reeb, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Reeb Line = papers co-authored together David Reeb links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014228
2 2016109
3 200862
4 200843
5 201143
6 201232
7 200731
8 200925
9 200815
10 200915
11 200813
12 201013
13 201613
14 201411
15 20138
16 20146
17 20225
18 20084
19 20113
20 20213

About David Reeb

David Reeb is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Artificial Intelligence, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Management Science and Operations Research, having authored 22 papers that have together received 685 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Quantum Information and Cryptography (7 papers), Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (4 papers), Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (4 papers), Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories (3 papers), Quantum Mechanics and Applications (3 papers), Advanced Bandit Algorithms Research (2 papers), Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture (2 papers) and Quantum and electron transport phenomena (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (290 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (154 citations), Artificial Intelligence (204 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (139 citations) and Astronomy and Astrophysics (62 citations). David Reeb has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Michael Marc Wolf, Stephen D. H. Hsu, Xavier Calmet A, Anders Søndberg Sørensen, Florentin Reiter, Michael J. Kastoryano, Teiko Heinosaari, Robert J. Scherrer, M. G. Raymer and René Schwonnek. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review Letters, New Journal of Physics, Physics Letters B, Europhysics Letters (EPL) and Classical and Quantum Gravity.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact